ECH430 GCU What Imagination Activities Sparks Young Children Imaginations? Chose an age level within the Birth to Age 8/Grade 3 group. Choose five differe

ECH430 GCU What Imagination Activities Sparks Young Children Imaginations? Chose an age level within the Birth to Age 8/Grade 3 group.

Choose five different types of modern fantasy books for that age level.

Create a 10-15 slide presentation that introduces the learners to selections and activities that will spark their imaginations. Be creative and include the following:

Comparison of the different types of modern fantasy
Titles, authors, and types with explanation
Description of each book
Descriptions of instructional activity for each book that will help spark children’s imaginations

In addition, create a title slide, reference slides, and slide notes that offer detailed explanations.

APA format is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.

This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

RESOURCES;

– Read “Fantasy for Children: Its Roots and Branches,” by Kiefer, from Journal of Children’s Literature (2013).

URL:https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ehh&AN=87330991&site=ehost-live&scope=site

– Read “All Is Well: The Epilogue in Children’s Fantasy Fiction,” by Cadden, from Narrative (2012).

URL:https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=79758919&site=ehost-live&scope=site Course Code
ECH-430
Class Code
ECH-430-O500
Criteria
Criteria
Percentage
100.0%
Comparison of the Different Types of Modern
Fantasy
15.0%
Titles, Authors, and Types
15.0%
Description of Each Book
15.0%
Descriptions of Instructional Activities
35.0%
Layout
5.0%
Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes
sentence construction, word choice, etc.)
5.0%
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling,
punctuation, grammar, language use)
5.0%
Evaluating and Documenting Sources (in-text
citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes,
references page listing and formatting, as
appropriate to assignment and style)
5.0%
Total Weightage
100%
Imagination Activity
No submission (0.00%)
Not addressed.
Not addressed.
Not addressed.
Not addressed.
The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing,
headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The
text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text,
small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting
colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or
bold formatting is evident.
Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use
are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use
of “primer prose” indicates writer either does not apply
figures of speech or uses them inappropriately.
Slide errors are pervasive enough that they impede
communication of meaning.
Contains no title slide, no references section, and no correctly
cited references within the body of the presentation.
90.0
Insufficient (65.00%)
Conveys confused or largely inaccurate comparison of the
different types of modern fantasy.
Less than three of the criteria are given.
Less than five descriptions are accurate or complete. Slide
notes are not given.
Conveys an accurate, although somewhat basic
understanding of less than five activities that will spark
children’s imaginations. Slide notes offer a partial
explanation.
The layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and
busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a
distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to
lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy
background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate
indentations of text.
Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register)
and/or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some
lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the
reader.
Title slide is incomplete or inaccurate. References section
includes sources, but many citation errors. Citations are
included within the body of the presentation but with many
errors.
Approaching (75.00%)
Conveys an accurate, although somewhat basic comparison
of the different types of modern fantasy.
All three of the criteria are given. No explanation is given for
the types.
All the descriptions are accurate. Slide notes offer a partial
explanation.
Conveys an accurate, although somewhat basic
understanding of five activities that will spark children’s
imaginations. Slide notes offer a partial explanation.
The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space
appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a
few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs,
color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance
readability.
Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the
most part.
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not
overly distracting to the reader.
Title slide has minor errors. References section includes
sources, but they are not consistently cited correctly.
Citations are included within the body of the presentation but
with some errors.
Acceptable (85.00%)
Offers accurate and complete comparison of the different
types of modern fantasy.
All three of the criteria are given. A clear explanation is given
for the types.
All the descriptions are accurate. Slide notes add detail.
Offers accurate understanding of five activities that will spark
children’s imaginations. Slide notes add detail.
The layout background and text complement each other and
enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to
read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text.
The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of
appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses
figures of speech to communicate clearly.
Slides are largely free of mechanical errors, although a few
may be present.
Title slide is complete. References section includes correctly
cited sources with minimal errors. Correct citations are
included within the body of the presentation.
Target (100.00%)
Offers insightful comparison of the different types of modern
fantasy.
All three of the criteria are given. A complete explanation is
given for the types.
All the descriptions are accurate. Slide notes are detailed,
concise, and insightful.
Offers accurate understanding of five activities that will spark
children’s imaginations. Slide notes offer a clear and insightful
explanation of each.
The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall
message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and
white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target
audience and to the point. The background and colors
enhance the readability of the text.
The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of
speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that
are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope.
Comments
Writer is clearly in control of standard, written academic
English.
Title slide is complete. References section includes correctly
cited sources. Correct citations are included within the body
of the presentation.
Points Earned
Course Code
ECH-430
Class Code
ECH-430-O500
Criteria
Criteria
Percentage
100.0%
Comparison of the Different Types of Modern
Fantasy
15.0%
Titles, Authors, and Types
15.0%
Description of Each Book
15.0%
Descriptions of Instructional Activities
35.0%
Layout
5.0%
Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes
sentence construction, word choice, etc.)
5.0%
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling,
punctuation, grammar, language use)
5.0%
Evaluating and Documenting Sources (in-text
citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes,
references page listing and formatting, as
appropriate to assignment and style)
5.0%
Total Weightage
100%
Imagination Activity
No submission (0.00%)
Not addressed.
Not addressed.
Not addressed.
Not addressed.
The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing,
headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The
text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text,
small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting
colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or
bold formatting is evident.
Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use
are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use
of “primer prose” indicates writer either does not apply
figures of speech or uses them inappropriately.
Slide errors are pervasive enough that they impede
communication of meaning.
Contains no title slide, no references section, and no correctly
cited references within the body of the presentation.
90.0
Insufficient (65.00%)
Conveys confused or largely inaccurate comparison of the
different types of modern fantasy.
Less than three of the criteria are given.
Less than five descriptions are accurate or complete. Slide
notes are not given.
Conveys an accurate, although somewhat basic
understanding of less than five activities that will spark
children’s imaginations. Slide notes offer a partial
explanation.
The layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and
busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a
distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to
lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy
background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate
indentations of text.
Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register)
and/or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some
lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the
reader.
Title slide is incomplete or inaccurate. References section
includes sources, but many citation errors. Citations are
included within the body of the presentation but with many
errors.
Approaching (75.00%)
Conveys an accurate, although somewhat basic comparison
of the different types of modern fantasy.
All three of the criteria are given. No explanation is given for
the types.
All the descriptions are accurate. Slide notes offer a partial
explanation.
Conveys an accurate, although somewhat basic
understanding of five activities that will spark children’s
imaginations. Slide notes offer a partial explanation.
The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space
appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a
few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs,
color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance
readability.
Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the
most part.
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not
overly distracting to the reader.
Title slide has minor errors. References section includes
sources, but they are not consistently cited correctly.
Citations are included within the body of the presentation but
with some errors.
Acceptable (85.00%)
Offers accurate and complete comparison of the different
types of modern fantasy.
All three of the criteria are given. A clear explanation is given
for the types.
All the descriptions are accurate. Slide notes add detail.
Offers accurate understanding of five activities that will spark
children’s imaginations. Slide notes add detail.
The layout background and text complement each other and
enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to
read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text.
The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of
appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses
figures of speech to communicate clearly.
Slides are largely free of mechanical errors, although a few
may be present.
Title slide is complete. References section includes correctly
cited sources with minimal errors. Correct citations are
included within the body of the presentation.
Target (100.00%)
Offers insightful comparison of the different types of modern
fantasy.
All three of the criteria are given. A complete explanation is
given for the types.
All the descriptions are accurate. Slide notes are detailed,
concise, and insightful.
Offers accurate understanding of five activities that will spark
children’s imaginations. Slide notes offer a clear and insightful
explanation of each.
The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall
message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and
white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target
audience and to the point. The background and colors
enhance the readability of the text.
The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of
speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that
are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope.
Comments
Writer is clearly in control of standard, written academic
English.
Title slide is complete. References section includes correctly
cited sources. Correct citations are included within the body
of the presentation.
Points Earned

Purchase answer to see full
attachment