Im studying for my Art & Design class and dont understand how to answer this. Can you help me study?
Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Mid-term Presentation ( Charlie Parker ) | Homework Essay Helpers
Get an essay WRITTEN FOR YOU, Plagiarism free, and by an EXPERT!
Presentation about Charlie Parker
answer the below in the Power points slides
Also I am attaching the audio for the part 2
Part I Musical Influences and Style Identification
-Who were the musicians, teachers and other musical influences that shaped your artist’s unique musical style?
-How would you classify the artist’s musical genre and unique style?
-What are the style characteristics that support this decision?
-Develop and format two or three slides with images and not too much written information.
-Include a You Tube video of the artist in performance.
Part II Musical Analysis
-Analyze the musical structure of your recording. This analysis map will be your final slide.
-Analyze the structure of your recording by mapping the sequence of musical events, left to right.
-Present and clarify the map features by answering the following questions:
-What is the specific style genre and sub genre?
-What is the meter?
-How long (number of bars) is each musical event?
-What are the types of musical events?
-What is the form of the main theme, head, song, etc.?
-Are there improvised solos?
-Are there transitions?
-Are there unique or unusual departures from standard design?
-What are the dominant timbres?
-Are there any unusual timbres?
-Any other relevant or unusual musical details?
This presentation will be graded on the parameters described in the Presentation Rubric.
Example For the Mapping
Intro Head Parker Improv Piano/Bass/Drums Improv Head Outro
4/4 meter AABA AABA (new lines) AA B X BA
4 bars 8888 8888 88 8 8 88 Free Form
2 x’s
Rubric
Presentation Rubric
Presentation Rubric
| Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent and OrganizationContent and Organization
|
| 4.0 pts
Rich in relevant content. Research supports and enhances a complete understanding of the topic
|
3.0 pts
Relevant and appropriate content. Research supports a clear understanding of biographical information and genre clarification.
|
2.0 pts
Acceptable content and relevant information. Some indications of adequate research and organization with regard to biographical and genre clarification
|
1.0 pts
Lacking in relevant content and continuity. Extraneous data. Little evidence of effort in research, planning and organization.
|
0.0 pts |
|
4.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeVisuals and Mechanics
|
| 4.0 pts
PowerPoint slides draw the audience in and generate curiosity in the topic. Interesting visuals and excellent focus on talking points.
|
3.0 pts
PowerPoint slides are easy to read and enhance the presenters information. Talking points only.
|
2.0 pts
Acceptable visuals. Not too wordy and busy. Some interesting graphics and color design.
|
1.0 pts
Poorly designed PowerPoint slides. Too wordy, difficult to see. Entire presentation on the slides.
|
0.0 pts
No Marks
|
|
4.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMusic Analysis
|
| 4.0 pts
Complete accuracy in map and display of events. Analysis stand on it’s own and is easy to understand. Presenters offer enhancing commentary.
|
3.0 pts
Accurate form analysis, and map. No errors in musical events. Analysis is easy to track.
|
2.0 pts
Acceptable analysis design. Map has some errors. Presenters have only minimal commentary.
|
1.0 pts
Numerous errors in form analysis. Not in map format. Lacking basic understanding of analysis data.
|
0.0 pts
No Marks
|
|
4.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDelivery and Teamwork
|
| 4.0 pts
Excellent preparation and collaborative effort. No reading, audience engagement and expert command of the topic.
|
3.0 pts
Strong preparation and collaboration. No reading, and some audience engagement.
|
2.0 pts
Indications of adequate preparation. Some reading, good balance and only minor presentation glitches
|
1.0 pts
Obvious lack of preparation. Too much reading, mumbling and lack of topic knowledge.
|
0.0 pts
No Marks
|
|
4.0 pts
|
|
Total Points: 16.0
|
