His 202. AJA review | Homework Helper

Can you help me understand this History question?

Recommendation

The instructor recommends allotting 300 minutes to complete this assignment. Time Recommendation: 180 minutes to read the academic journal article and 120 minutes to write and edit the 2-page review. This is only a recommendation, you may spend more or less time on this assignment depending on your ability and availability.

Introduction

Historians love to review the works of other historians. Whenever a new history book is written, the historical profession selects experts in particular fields of studies to determine the value and contribution the new work will have on the academic discipline. Upon completion of the course’s reading, each student will be considered an expert and be required to read an academic article and submit a 2-page review (minimum). Students are encouraged to celebrate the author’s accomplishments, but also challenge anything that seems substandard. Style and creativity play a crucial role in the success of your review.

Pick one of the Academic Journal Articles below:

• Antigay Prejudice and the 1979 Backlash against Disco.pdf
• Birth Control and the Black Community in the 1960s.pdf
• Bloody Christmas and the Irony of Police Professionalism.pdf
• Chinese American Women Defense Workers.pdf
• Diet and Masculinity in Postwar America.pdf
• Japanese Americans and Racism in CA Impact WWII.pdf
• Lincoln and Eleanor Ragsdale, Collaboration, and Community Activism in Phoenix.pdf
• McCarthyism, Mexican Americans, and the Los Angeles Committee for Protection.pdf
• Remembering a Vietnam War Firefight.pdf
• Ronald Reagan and Student Unrest in California.pdf

Format

• Two pages (minimum)
• 12 point font
• Double spaced
• Paragraphs

Each paper should include the following:

1. The author’s purpose in writing the article
2. The author’s main thesis
3. The author’s challenging of other historical viewpoints
4. The evidence utilized by the author (specifically primary sources)
5. Personal likes/dislikes
6. How could the author make the work stronger?
7. The recommended audience for the article?
8. Explain how this article contributes to understanding the history of the United States
9. An example of how this article supports/contradicts Eric Foner’s Give Me Liberty
10. Suggested reading to accompany this work (not required, but helpful)

Helpful Information

• Click here for a step by step guide to writing a successful AJA Review
• Click here to discover the difference between a primary and secondary source.

Instructions for Submitting

• On the right-hand side of the screen click on the icon that says “SUBMIT ASSIGNMENT”
• Click on the tab “File Upload” to attach your AJA Review.
• Click on the tab “Text Entry” if you wish to copy and paste OR write your review in the box provided.
• Be sure to click “SUBMIT ASSIGNMENT” after you finishing uploading the document. If you need help converting pages click on this link.
• The AJA Rubric (1) (1)

  The AJA Rubric (1) (1)

  Criteria	Ratings	Pts
  This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Page and Format Requirement	30.0 pts Meets minimum page requirement (2 full pages). 5.0 pts Does not meet minimum page requirement (1.5 pages or less)	30.0 pts
  This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome AJA Requirements and Quality	30.0 pts Answers the specific AJA requirements. Incorporates pertinent and detailed information from scholarly work. Maintains focus/avoids being sidetracked by tangents. Presents all information clearly and concisely and in an organized manner. Avoids distracting grammar/spelling/etc. problems. 25.0 pts Answers most of the AJA requirements, however, may miss one of the following (thesis, purpose, relationship to history, or target audience). Incorporates pertinent and detailed information from scholarly work. Maintains focus/avoids being sidetracked by tangents. Presents all information clearly and concisely and in an organized manner. Avoids distracting grammar/spelling/etc. problems. 20.0 pts Answers many of the AJA requirements, however, missed more than one of the following (thesis, purpose, relationship to history, or target audience). Incorporates pertinent and detailed information from scholarly work. Maintains focus/avoids being sidetracked by tangents. Presents all information clearly and concisely and in an organized manner. Avoids distracting grammar/spelling/etc. problems. 15.0 pts May have met all the AJA requirements, however did not incorporate pertinent and detailed information from the scholarly work and/or sidetracked off into a reactionary tangent. Presents information in a manner that is sometimes unclear, and/or has significant organization problems. Avoids distracting grammar/spelling/etc. problems. 10.0 pts May have met all the AJA requirement, however did not incorporate pertinent and detailed information from the scholarly work and/or sidetracked off into a reactionary tangent. Provides no information that can be understood or related to the specific topic May lack any recognizable organization May contain enough distracting grammar/spelling/etc. problems to make it substantially incomprehensible.	30.0 pts
  This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Primary Source Identification	20.0 pts Identified 3 specific primary sources. 15.0 pts Identified 2 specific primary sources. 10.0 pts Identified 1 specific primary source. 8.0 pts Identified primary sources, but not specific. 1.0 pts Identified the wrong source. 0.0 pts No attempt made to identify primary sources.	20.0 pts
  This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Textbook Critical Analysis	20.0 pts Support/contradict the textbook with a direct quote from textbook. 15.0 pts Support/contradiction validated with page number or chapter reference instead of a direct quote. 10.0 pts Support/contradiction asserted without any specific validation from the textbook using a direct quote. Does include a generalized narrative of why support/contradict the textbook. 5.0 pts Support/contradiction asserted without any specific validation from the textbook using a direct quote. Also lacks any sort of generalize narrative of why support or contradiction was proposed. 2.0 pts Student stated that it did not support or contradict the textbook without validation. 1.0 pts Student obviously did not read the book so their analysis of support or contradiction is too general, too vague, and/or incorrect. 0.0 pts No support/contradiction of the textbook.	20.0 pts
  Total Points: 100.0

  Previous
  Next