Research and Advanced Practice Nursing Presentation. Need help developing a powerpoint presentation that covers assignment criteria listed below. I will be

Research and Advanced Practice Nursing Presentation. Need help developing a powerpoint presentation that covers assignment criteria listed below. I will be working with you to make this happen as I have the information needed to address what needs to be listed. This powerpoint presentation will be presented with audio and so a few sentences to go over each slide should be included in the “notes” section below each slide.

Assignment Criteria:

Explain three (3) important concepts learned throughout the course that relate to theory.a. Propose two (2) reasons how the chosen concepts will impact the future of nursing research and advanced practice nursing.
Explain three (3) important concepts learned throughout the course that relate to research.
b. Propose two (2) reasons how the chosen concepts will impact the future of nursing research and advanced practice nursing.
Explain three (3) important concepts learned throughout the course that relate to practice.
c. Propose two (2) reasons how the chosen concepts will impact the future of nursing research and advanced practice nursing.
Formulate three strategies that will facilitate the future success of nursing research.
Develop a recorded PowerPoint presentation/PPT using Kaltura in the form of a scholarly presentation. Follow the instructions for using Kaltura located in Canvas under Modules and APA Documents/Resources.
Once the PPT is created, utilize Kaltura media to present the PPT with voice over (use computer and microphone).
The PowerPoint (PPT) presentation should not be more than 10-12 slides (excluding the title slide and reference slide) and 8-10 minutes in length. Be complete and concise. Use bulleted statements not complete sentences or paragraphs.
Use APA format for PPT, which always includes a title slide, a reference slide, and APA requirements. Resources found in APA Documents/Resources.
A minimum of three (3) references will be required for this assignment. References should be from scholarly peer-reviewed journals (check Ulrich’s Periodical Directory) and be less than five (5) years old.
Comment and critique one classmate’s presentations by Friday of Week 8. (**delete if not being used)
Submit both the PPT and the Kaltura presentation by posted due date
Include the following information in the slides:

Slide 1: Title-develop a title slide. This should include the title of the presentation, student name, and the university name.
Slide 2: Introduction-Brief overview of the PPT. Use key bulleted points not paragraphs
Slide 3: Purpose Statement-Develop the purpose statement utilizing the instructions above (use bulleted points)
Slide 4: Learned Concepts Related to Theory.
Slide 5: Discuss the impact on the future of nursing research and advance practice nursing.
Slide 6: Learned Concepts Related to Research.
Slide 7: Discuss the impact on the future of nursing research and advance practice nursing.
Slide 8: Learned Concepts Related to Practice.
Slide 9: Discuss the impact on the future of nursing research and advance practice nursing.
Slide 10: Formulate three strategies that could facilitate the future success of nursing research.
Slide 11: Conclusion
Slide 12: Reference list in APA format [Type here]
There should be no cyber laws protecting the victims of cyber privacy crimes
People do not usually understand the reason behind cyber bullying. Rachael, my childhood
friend is one victim of cyber bullying. Considering that she has faced the menace more than once
is an understatement. At some point, she has been depressed. After her recklessness online, she
turns into the courts to sue people who have bullied her. Expectedly, she is told that she is reckless
with her information, especially the private life. Personally, I don’t articulate for people being
reckless with their information on the internet and later seek measures in the “justice” system.
People should rather be responsible about their information and always understand the privacy
policy online. The justice system is supposed to implement guidelines, that make people
understand the consequences, and the need of being responsible online.
Internet is a very risky platform especially when the user is not optimally responsible for
what they do and post on it. The people responsible are usually adults, including parents, teachers,
and guardians. They have to keep the responsibility of guiding the young people on what they
should do when online. Personally, I have witnessed people who post stuff on the internet, and
end up being victims of cyber bullying, and turn around to invite the media and the authorities to
come for their rescue. People are actively online, and have an eye on the events that are
happening. Social media has given the complete freedom for people to always share stories about
themselves, and people are logically misusing the platforms. One decides to post a picture about
their social life, and later people use the picture to build memes, projecting his or her complain
about cyber bullying. This seems to be a self-instilled problem which one may tend to forget on
the best way to solve it. They therefore, turn on to the courts and justice systems to fight back.
This situation seems to be self-inflicted pain because of the recklessness of posting any kind of
social emotion to the public, hence, subjecting oneself to cyber bullying.
[Type here]
People need to be responsible on the information that they share and understand
consequences. The specialty of people behaving adult and also understanding the difference
between sensitive and insensitive information is very crucial. Rachael, my childhood friend is
always objective towards showing off, on social media. She posts videos and photos of every
moment and context that she is and posts that to various social media platforms including
Instagram, we chat, and even Facebook. However, at one point, she posted a video of her dancing
while drunk, unknowingly revealing a lot of information that was private. One aspect that thought
of is that this was her mistake, which led to her being bullied online. She should have known
what kind of information they must share online and that which should not be shared. The fantasy
of showing people the current status, without prior knowledge on what this information may
project can be a little irresponsible.
From the incidence in Harvard institution, in the year 2018, hackers from Iran stole their
research papers from a number of universities, and started selling them to owners and others
without the consent of their owners (Ariel). This is one factor that shows institutional
irresponsibility that has been advocated on the highest degree. This kind of recklessness will be
subject to storage that was not well encrypted or protected. This is why it is important to always
have possible sensible information stored in secure databases or locations.
Instead of Cyber Rules, there should be guidelines on how to ensure that people remain
responsible online and on their mobile devices in order to cut of the vulnerability. Cao, my brother
has always been keen on social media; hence, he does not share any information that he may
presumes to be contradicting or may reveal any of his private life or anyone’s. His argument is
that, he must own his life, and be responsible to stay peaceful with the society.
[Type here]
When people understand these procedures and take them seriously, they will be able to
follow them and ensure that there are no any incidences of cybercrime, especially cyber bullying
and hacking. The best way is to ensure that there are measures in place to ensure that people are
formally informed and have the basic knowledge towards having what they aught to do in order
to achieve the best outcomes. My cousin has a kid, who was once a victim of cyber bullying. At
the age of 6 years the lady owned a smart phone and was fully connected to the internet at home.
She posted a video online of herself dancing, and resulted in her being bullied online. Because
of the failed guidelines, parents should stay in place to ensure that their children no not have
carless use of their devices if they must have them. According to Seiler & Navarro, Children in
the current era are having mobile devices, and they are given full access to the internet platforms
like social media. Parents should take the responsibility to guide their children on this. They
should give guidance to children on the guides so that they are not victims of cyber bullying, and
lead to other effects like depression.
Companies should ensure they protect their employees and customers’ data. Companies
need to take charge of the task of ensuring that they have safe storage of employees and
customers. This is among the most sensitive data, with which if some hackers access them, they
can use them for fraudulent tasks. There are companies that are optimally responsible for
customers’ information and must ensure that the information is safe and subject to ultimate levels
of security (Botha et al.). Such companies include google, amazon, Microsoft, and many more.
They should also never share sensitive information to the public or any platforms that have risky
obligations. There must be a platform where clients sign a confidentiality note with the companies
or employees in order to ensure that their information is optimally protected, and the offenders
may be the ones facing the law, or be responsible for their actions. The Talk Bench in the year
[Type here]
2015 revealed their customers accounts on their platforms, and hackers used the information to
hack into their client accounts and stole from them. In total, 4545 customers in total were affected
(Layla).
One must always read the Privacy Policy before accepting any request. Every individual is
supposed to read any privacy policy of any platform before they accord any kind of transaction
with them. With this into account, it proves that they are able to stay responsible with themselves,
and also stay clear with any contingency that comes out in form of misuse of their data. Rachael,
argues that the precautionary act of making rules should be strict enough to control the
assumptions that people make about the status of people on the internet in general. The rules are
supposed to be amended because, they limit some and open some for parties like the bloggers to
directly attack people. The privacy policies are always open, and people who do not read them
always fall victim (Diane). However, this is always contrary, and the fact that rules are readily
available, people tend to follow a different process of resolving it incase of a problem. People do
not read the privacy policies, hence, incase they are victims, they should persevere the
consequences. Avoiding the privacy policies is somehow reckless and one may not blame
anybody incase their privacy is violated. Therefore, people should always learn to read the
privacy policies before they engage into any transaction, instead of starting to run to the rules for
court cases (Berreby).
Adults should never even seek for justice based on rules since they already know them.
People are supposed to teach their children about cyber crime and guide them on the requirements
without any trace of playing victim. They are also supposed to limit their children on the extent
to which they access the internet and social media. The rules should only be applicable to
children, and in most cases, their parents are supposed to be held responsible. This is because
[Type here]
they must be knowing what they need to do and the best implications. The Australian constitution
defines that the children’s rules for cyber crime should be different from the adults, because for
the adults, they claim the responsibility (Australian Constitution, 3.6).
Information that is leaked on the internet illegally may reveal sensitive and confidential
information to the hackers, who use it for wrong means. Therefore, the instigators must be
apprehended based on the rules and regulations in the justice system. Some of the consequences
that people may be getting from this approach include cyber bullying which may affect the
individual victim mentally. Somehow, they may be subjects of isolation and public
misconceptions. According to Yasmine, at some point and individual by the name Ashley
Madison was attacked in July and his data stolen and used by criminals to shame him. This is an
indication of people using mistakes of people and taking advantage to bully them on the internet.
This led to massive damage of the privacy of so many people and users of the platforms.
When the information that is placed wrongly on the internet is found by hackers, they may
also use to undertake a number of crimes, without their knowledge. People may use the
information for purposes that they are not intended to. Therefore. People need to have rules that
can lender punishable offences like these through the justice system. An example is that which
WhatsApp accounts of Karachi Users were hacked and could have been used to threaten other
individuals without the knowledge of the owners of these accounts. The users had to pay money
to the hackers for their accounts to be recovered (Zhong and Yu).
Leaked information can be used to threaten the life or financial status of an individual.
Hackers who have gained access to personal information often threaten the lives of the victims
or ask for money so that the information can be kept secret. Hackers attacked Canada computer
systems and they had to pay through bitcoin for them to recover their system (Baek et al.).
[Type here]
Therefore, such threats lead to having security threats that are profoundly able to lead to a crime
society or sometimes aspects of dear and depression. Therefore, the rules must be put in place in
order to have such actions defined through accountability in the justice system.
There are always rules and regulations that limit cybercrime. However, I think that the
people who fall victims are always the ones to blame and must be accorded guidance. In y position
people and companies with information about people must always be responsible because any
action always has its repercussions. Therefore, optimal responsibility is always paramount and
must be instigated in order to achieve the best. In order to understand this, people are subject to
connecting the rules as guidelines and avoid any accounted contingency, because the effects of
cybercrime to the victims may be related to irresponsibility of some parties.
[Type here]
Works Cited
Agelidis, Yasmine. “Protecting the Good, the Bad, and the Ugly: “Exposure” Data Breaches and
Suggestions For Coping With Them.” Berkeley Technology Law Journal 31.2 (2016):
1057-1078.
Baek, Young Min, et al. “Changing the default setting for information privacy protection: What
and whose personal information can be better protected?.” The Social Science
Journal 51.4 (2014): 523-533.
Botha, Johnny, Mariki Eloff, and Marthie Grobler. “Ethical and legal issues involved in the proactive collection of personal information with the aim of reducing online
disclosure.” IFIP International Conference on Human Choice and Computers. Springer,
Cham, 2016.
Bustamante, Diane. “Florida Joins the Fight Against Revenge Porn: Analysis of Florida’s New
Anti-Revenge Porn Law.” FIU L. Rev. 12 (2016): 357.
” Chapter 3 – Parliament Of Australia “. Aph.Gov.Au, 2020,
https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Legal_and_Constit
utional_Affairs/Cyberbullying/Report/c03. Accessed 8 Apr 2020.
Goldnick, Layla. “Coddling the Internet: How the CDA Exacerbates the Proliferation of Revenge
Porn and Prevents the Meaningful Remedy for Its Victims.” Cardozo JL & Gender 21
(2014): 583.
Ronneburger, Ariel. “Sex, privacy, and webpages: Creating a legal remedy for victims of porn
2.0.” Syracuse Sci. & Tech. L. Rep. (2009): 1.
[Type here]
Seiler, S. J., & Navarro, J. N. (2014). Bullying on the pixel playground: Investigating risk factors
of
cyberbullying
at
the
intersection
of
children’s
online-offline
social
lives. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 8(4), Article
6. https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2014-4-6
Wang, Zhong, and Qian Yu. “Privacy trust crisis of personal data in China in the era of Big Data:
The survey and countermeasures.” Computer Law & Security Review 31.6 (2015): 782792.
Xie, Fei. “Personal Information Protection in the Era of Big Data.” 5th International Conference
on Economics, Management, Law and Education (EMLE 2019). Atlantis Press, 2020.
to ultimate levels of security (Botha et al.). Such companies include google, amazon, Microsoft,
and many more. They should also never share sensitive information to the public or any platforms
that have risky obligations. There must be a platform where clients sign a confidentiality note
with the companies or employees in order to ensure that their information is optimally protected,
and the offenders may be the ones facing the law, or be responsible for their actions. The Talk
Bench in the year 2015 revealed their customers accounts on their platforms, and hackers used
the information to hack into their client accounts and stole from them. In total, 4545 customers
4 What is
this?
in total were affected (Layla).
One must always read the Privacy Policy before accepting any request
Every individual is supposed to read any privacy policy of any platform before they accord
any kind of transaction with them. With this into account, it proves that they are able to stay
responsible with themselves, and also stay clear with any contingency that comes out in form of
misuse of their data. Rachael, argues that the precautionary act of making rules should be strict
enough to control the assumptions that people make about the status of people on the internet in
general. The rules are supposed to be amended because they limit some and open some for parties
like the bloggers to directly attack people. The privacy policies are always open, and people who
do not read them always fall victim (Diane). However, this is always contrary, and the fact that
rules are readily available, people tend to follow a different process of resolving it incase of a
problem. People do not read the privacy policies, hence, incase they are victims, they should
persevere the consequences. Avoiding the privacy policies is somehow reckless and one may not
Adults should never even seek for justice based on rules since they already know them
People are supposed to teach their children about cyber crime and guide them on the
requirements without any trace of playing victim. They are also supposed to limit their children
on the extent to which they access the internet and social media. The rules should only be
applicable to children, and in most cases, their parents are supposed to be held responsible. This
is because they must be knowing what they need to do and the best implications. The Australian
For example,
constitution defines that the children’s rules for cyber crime should be different from the adults,
because for the adults, they claim the responsibility (Australian Constitution, 3.6).
Opposition
Information that is leaked on the internet illegally may reveal sensitive and confidential
information to the hackers, who use it for wrong means. Therefore, the instigators must be
apprehended based on the rules and regulations in the justice system. Some of the consequences
that people may be getting from this approach include cyber bullying which may affect the
individual victim mentally. Somehow, they may be subjects of isolation and public
misconceptions. According to Yasmine, at some point and individual by the name Ashley
Madison was attacked in July and his data stolen and used by criminals to shame him. This is an eacher
indication of people using mistakes of people and taking advantage to bully them on the internet. Knaus to
This led to massive damage of the privacy of so many people and users of the platforms.
have to
When the information that is placed wrongly on the internet is found by hackers, they may do that
also use to undertake a number of crimes, without their knowledge. People may use the
when
information for purposes that they are not intended to. Therefore. People need to have rules that
“well-
can lender punishable offences like these through the justice system. An example is that which
known,
trust you.
You don’t
you urce is
WhatsApp accounts of Karachi Users were hacked and could have been used to threaten other
individuals without the knowledge of the owners of these accounts. The users had to pay money
to the hackers for their accounts to be recovered (Zhong and Yu).
Leaked information can be used to threaten the life or financial status of an individual.
Hackers who have gained access to personal information often threaten the lives of the victims
or ask for money so that the information can be kept secret. Hackers attacked Canada computer
systems and they had to pay through bitcoin for them to recover their system (Baek et al.).
Therefore, such threats lead to having security threats that are profoundly able to lead to a crime
society or sometimes aspects of dear and depression. Therefore, the rules must be put in place in
order to have such actions defined through accountability in the justice system.
Conclusion
There are always rules and regulations that limit cybercrime. However, I think that the
people who fall victims are always the ones to blame and must be accorded guidance. In y position
people and companies with information about people must always be responsible because any
action always has its repercussions. Therefore, optimal responsibility is always paramount and
must be instigated in order to achieve the best. In order to understand this, people are subject to
connecting the rules as guidelines and avoid any accounted contingency, because the effects of
cybercrime to the victims may be related to irresponsibility of some parties.
– There is a TON of Superflurs content. You incalde a lot of sentences
that are summary statements. There are too many for me to note!
This is absent of specifics, data stories with actal details and overall
use of claim structures, Concrete langrage, and Framing.
– Raisit each claim and consider if you
have used strong terms to
appeal through pathos, remated the filler language to strengthan logest
ethos.
There should be no cyber laws protecting the victims of cyber privacy crimes
People do not usually understand the reason behind cyber bullying. Rachael, my childhood
friend is one victim of cyber bullying. Considering that she has faced the menace more than once
is an understatement. At some point, she has been depressed. After her recklessness online, she
turns into the courts to sue people who have bullied her. Expectedly, she is told that she is reckless
with her information, especially the private life. Personally, I don’t articulate for people being
reckless with their information on the internet and later seek measures in the “justice” system.
People should rather be responsible about their information and always understand the …
Purchase answer to see full
attachment