MSC 300 Ashford University Impact of E Commerce On SME In Australia Journal Analysis this is my final project, i need quality work. the file below has the

MSC 300 Ashford University Impact of E Commerce On SME In Australia Journal Analysis this is my final project, i need quality work. the file below has the instructions. MSC 300
GRADING RUBRIC FOR THE CRITIQUE
MSC 300 is an Inquiry course, which requires a special research project as part of its
curriculum. For this course, the syllabus describes this requirement. The paper should run
about 4 single spaced pages. The requirement is worth 40 points.
Choose any business-related paper from the general business journal literature (accounting,
sales, marketing, operations research/analytics, business medical services, business software
development, etc.) either in paper or electronic format. Suitable journals include Harvard
Business Review, CrossTalk, Interfaces, University of Chicago Journal of Business, etc. Not
acceptable publications are popular magazine articles, trade association magazine articles, or
newspaper articles. Meet with the instructor if there are any questions about the suitability of
the paper and source.
i.
ii.
iii.
Make a copy of the journal paper and attach to the back of your critique. Include a page
showing the Cover and Table of Contents from the journal you chose. If the journal is
online, then attach a copy of the paper and a screenshot of some kind of the journal
masthead.
State the author’s null and alternative hypotheses. Write an explanation of the hypothesis
the author was testing in plain English. Use of statistical symbols such as “Ho:” will not be
acceptable. Assume your audience is middle management who are not experts in statistical
methods.
Write your critique of the research methods and conclusions the author drew using plain
English. You may either agree or disagree with the conclusions and/or methods used by the
author.
Grading
_____ 1. Was the selected journal paper business-oriented. 5 pts.
_____ 2. Is there a copy of the selected journal paper attached to the back of the critique. Did
it include a page showing the Cover and Table of Contents (or masthead “screenshot” if from an
electronic format) from the journal chosen. 4 pts. (Zero points if not from an academic journal.)
______ 3. Was the journal paper a recap of the author’s research that made a new contribution
to the body of knowledge, as opposed to a “report” which accumulated already existing
knowledge. The body of knowledge contribution may be either substantial or small. 8 pts.
_____ 4. Did the student’s critique contain a statement and explanation of the author’s null
and alternative hypotheses in plain English and in the student’s own words. 8 pts.
_____ 5. Was the student’s critique of the author’s research methods free from statistical
jargon and symbols, and written in plain English easily understandable by a middle manager
who does not have an analytics background. 5 pts.
_____ 6. Did the student’s critique of the author’s conclusions free from statistical jargon and
symbols, and written in plain English easily understandable by a middle manager who does not
have an analytics background. 5 pts.
_____ 7. Was the student’s critique of the author’s conclusions logical and based on data or
other facts, and not based on opinions such as often found in editorials, social media postings,
popular discussions, etc. Were the sources of the data/other facts references footnoted. 5 pts.

Purchase answer to see full
attachment