NUR670 GCU Interviewing Nursing Leaders And Leadership Assignment Identify three nursing leaders you would like to interview for this paper. The nursing le

NUR670 GCU Interviewing Nursing Leaders And Leadership Assignment Identify three nursing leaders you would like to interview for this paper. The nursing leaders may have a variety of leadership styles, but they must all currently hold positions of leadership.

Write a paper (1,000-1,250 words) that describes the results of the interviews and addresses the following:

Ask the leaders what they believe is their preferred leadership style and ask them to describe how that style has helped them achieve success.
Explain why you chose each individual leader.
Identify, compare, and contrast their styles and note any examples of servant or transformational leadership.
Identify missed opportunities or questions you wish you had asked during the interviews.

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance. Course Code
NUR-670
Class Code
NUR-670-O501
Criteria
Content
Percentage
70.0%
Identify Leader’s Preferred Leadership Style(s)
and How it Has Benefited Them
20.0%
Interviewer Explains Why He She Chose Each
Leader Interviewed
20.0%
Compare and Contrast Leadership Styles of
Servant Leaders
20.0%
Interviewer Notes Examples of Servant
Leadership or Missed Opportunities During the
Interview
10.0%
Organization and Effectiveness
20.0%
Thesis Development and Purpose
7.0%
Argument Logic and Construction
8.0%
Mechanics of Writing (Includes spelling,
punctuation, grammar, and language use.)
5.0%
Format
10.0%
Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the
major and assignment)
5.0%
Research Citations (In-text citations for
paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference
page listing and formatting, as appropriate to
assignment and style.)
5.0%
Total Weightage
100%
Nurse Leader Interviews Paper
No submission (0.00%)
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
132.0
Unsatisfactory (75.00%)
Content neglects to address some or all areas of leadership
style identification, preferred leadership styles, and how
chosen leadership style has benefited leader as addressed by
assignment criteria.
Interviewer neglects to explain why he or she chose each
leader interviewed.
Interviewer neglects to compare and contrast leadership
styles of servant leaders.
Content neglects to cover examples of servant leadership and
or missed opportunities during the interview.
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing
claim.
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The
conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is
incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede
communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and
or sentence construction are used.
Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format
is rarely followed correctly.
No reference page is included. No citations are used.
Less than Satisfactory (80.00%)
Content minimally addresses some or all areas of leadership
style identification, preferred leadership styles, and how
chosen leadership style has benefited leader as addressed by
assignment criteria.
Interviewer does not adequately explain why he or she chose
each leader interviewed.
Interviewer neglects to adequately compare and contrast
leadership styles of servant leaders.
Content is minimal in its coverage of examples of servant
leadership and or missed opportunities during the interview.
Thesis and or main claim are insufficiently developed and or
vague; purpose is not clear.
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks
consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some
sources have questionable credibility.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the
reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence
structure, and or word choice are present.
Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing
or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.
Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used.
Satisfactory (88.00%)
Content covers all areas of leadership style identification,
preferred leadership styles, and how chosen leadership style
has benefited leader as addressed by assignment criteria.
Interviewer adequately explains why he or she chose each
leader interviewed.
Interviewer adequately compares and contrasts leadership
styles of servant leaders.
Content accurately covers examples of servant leadership and
missed opportunities during the interview.
Thesis and or main claim are apparent and appropriate to
purpose.
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The
argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument
logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources
used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the
thesis.
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not
overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure
and audience-appropriate language are used.
Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although
some minor errors may be present.
Reference page is included and lists sources used in the
paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although
some errors may be present.
Good (92.00%)
Content is accurate in covering all areas of leadership style
identification, preferred leadership styles, and how chosen
leadership style has benefited leader as addressed by
assignment criteria.
Interviewer offers detailed reasons about why he or she
chose each leader interviewed.
Interviewer compares and contrasts leadership styles of
servant leaders in a detailed manner.
Content accurately covers examples of servant leadership and
missed opportunities during the interview while providing
detail.
Thesis and or main claim are clear and forecast the
development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of
the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of
argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of
claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are
authoritative.
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may
be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective
figures of speech are used.
Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no
errors in formatting style.
Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited
sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is
usually correct.
Excellent (100.00%)
Content is comprehensive and accurate in covering all areas
of leadership style identification, preferred leadership styles,
and how chosen style leadership has benefited leader as
addressed by assignment criteria, along with thoughtful
reflection.
Interviewer offers detailed reasons about why he or she
chose each leader interviewed, while demonstrating
reflective thought.
Interviewer compares and contrasts leadership styles of
servant leaders in a detailed manner, while offering
thoughtful reflection.
Content accurately covers examples of servant leadership and
missed opportunities during the interview while providing
detail along with thoughtful reflection.
Thesis and or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of
the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement
makes the purpose of the paper clear.
Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in
a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are
authoritative.
Comments
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic
English.
All format elements are correct.
In-text citations and a reference page are complete and
correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.
Points Earned

Purchase answer to see full
attachment