The purpose of this discussion is to enhance the student’s clinical reasoning, confidence and learning of various pediatric and women health topics through virtual presentation and facilitated discussion. This assignment is completed in weeks 2 and 6.
Activity Learning Outcomes
Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
HFM Disease
Get an essay WRITTEN FOR YOU, Plagiarism free, and by an EXPERT!
Through this assignment, the student will demonstrate the ability to:
Apply advanced preventative and ill visit knowledge to the care of children and women (CO 1, 2, 4).
Apply appropriate pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic interventions in the care of children and women (CO 1, 2, 4).
Apply advanced preventive and routine exam knowledge to the care of women and children (CO 1, 2, 4).
Explore health promotion or disease prevention specific to the child-bearing family (CO 1, 2, 4).
Locate and apply current guidelines for specialized exams and care in women and children (CO 1, 2, 4).
Discuss common issues of women’s health (CO 1, 4).
Summarize patient findings into an organized oral presentation (CO 1, 2, 4).
Women’s Health Grand Rounds due
Total Points Possible: 110
PRESENTATION REQUIREMENTS:
In Weeks 2 & 6, you will create a video Powerpoint presentation, narrated in Kaltura, on a select topics assigned to you by your professor in week.
Please refer to the “How to use Kaltura” recording below. If you have technical issues, please contact your faculty or Tech Support. Make sure you click on the Screen & Webcam box to record in Kaltura. For more information on Kaltura, see Resources.
In each presentation, a student must discuss the following:
Pathophysiology, epidemiology, risk factors, and clinical assessment findings for the assigned topic
A minimum of three (3) differential diagnoses, listed
Typical clinical assessment findings for each assigned topic, in detail
Any applicable diagnostic studies to confirm the diagnosis of the assigned topic. If not applicable, discuss why)
Prevention (if not applicable, discuss why)
Treatment including non-pharmacologic management and pharmacologic management (if not applicable, discuss why)
Patient and/or family education
Discuss best practices for optimal outcomes
The overall presentation must meet the following requirements:
The presentation should be interesting, professional, and focused to the topic
Lab coat and name tag/badge must be worn
Visual aids should be included (i.e., pictures, charts, graphics, mindmap, algorithm, etc.)
Utilize a minimal of six peer-reviewed scholarly articles from Chamberlain Online Library and/or current evidence-based clinical guidelines to support your findings.
Upload your presentation to the discussion board by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT.
Begin facilitating discussion and continue to lead it throughout the week by posting three (3) open-ended questions on your topic. These should not be questions that can easily be answered by watching your presentation. The questions should add additional information to the discussion.
PARTICIPATION REQUIREMENTS:
Interactive Dialogue with Peers
Post a response to the presentation questions of at least two (2) peers on two (2) different days.
Responses to peer presentation question should be insightful and substantive.
Interactive Dialogue with Faculty
Students must respond substantively to all faculty-directed question on three (3) separate posts. You must answer all questions from faculty directed at you on your presentation as well as answer the faculty questions on a minimal of two peer posts).
Ground Rounds Summary Criteria
Starting on Saturday, add summary post to the original grand rounds presentation that summarizes the discussion. Includes conclusions from the collective group discussion on the topic. presentations and respond. Summaries posted before Saturday will receive a zero for the Summary requirement criteria/category
DISCUSSION FORMAT
Category
Points
%
Description
Introduction
10
9%
Introduction of chosen grand rounds topic includes a detailed review of pathophysiology, epidemiology, and risk factors.
Clinical Assessment
5
4.5%
Four (4) typical clinical assessment findings for the chosen topic are included, in detail.
Differential Diagnoses
10
9%
A minimum of three (3) differential diagnoses are listed and discussed in detail
Diagnostic Studies/Labs
5
4.5%
Diagnostic studies and laboratory tests that can be used to confirm diagnosis are listed with rationale included
Prevention and Treatment Options
10
9%
Prevention AND treatment options, including first line medication and non-pharmacological options are presented
Education
10
9%
Patient AND family education are discussed in detail with rationales
Identify Outcomes
5
4.5%
Describe optimal outcomes after treatment with suggested medication, including expected follow up care.
Lead Discussion
10
9%
Student fully facilitates a discussion relevant to the presentation topic by incorporating three (3) open-ended discussion questions for peers
AND
Questions posed allow students to apply additional concepts or explore additional information relevant to the topic
Interactive Dialogue with Student Peers
10
9%
Interactive Dialogue with Student Peers
Student responds substantively with additional insight to peer presentations
Student responds to at least two different peer presentations
Student responses are on at least two (2) different days
Student fully answers all three questions posted by a peer
(4 required elements)
Interactive Dialogue with Faculty
10
9%
Student responds substantively with additional insight to all faculty directed questions on three (3) separate posts with the following criteria: Student must answer all questions faculty asks on the student’s post and all questions asked by faculty on a minimal of two (2) peers’ post.
Summary Requirement
10
9%
Starting on Saturday, add summary post to the original grand rounds presentation that summarizes the discussion. Includes conclusions from the collective group discussion on the topic. Summary post is due Sunday before 11:59 p.m. MT, ** Do Not Post a Summary before Saturday** Peers need time to review presentations and respond. Summaries posted before Saturday will receive a zero for the Summary requirement criteria/category
95
86%
Total CONTENT Points= 95pts
DISCUSSION FORMAT
Category
Points
%
Description
Evidence Based Research Articles
10
9%
Include six (6) evidence-based support (within last 5 years). Three (3) must be peer reviewed journal articles from Chamberlain Online Library. The remaining three (3) may be scholarly evidence including journal articles, research articles and/or clinical practice guidelines from reputable source(s) for the student’s own presentation
Presentation Development
5
4.5%
Overall presentation is clear, concise, and organized; demonstrated ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources; recorded in Kaltura.Lab coat and name badge present. Visual aid is present during presentation.
15
14%
Total FORMAT Points= 15pts
110
100%
DISCUSSION TOTAL= 110 points
**To see view the grading criteria/rubric, please click on the 3 dots in the box at the end of the solid gray bar above the discussion board title and then Show Rubric.
PLEASE MAKE SURE THAT YOU FOLLOW THE RUBRIC
USE ONLY RESOURCES WITHIN 5 YEARS MAX
Utilize a minimal of six peer-reviewed scholarly articles from Chamberlain Online Library and/or current evidence-based clinical guidelines to support your findings.
