Introduction
The US Organ and Tissue Transplantation Association defines organ donation as the removal of an organ or tissue from either a deceased or living donor for purposes of transplantation (Bramstedt 104). The removal of tissues from the donor and transplanting them to the recipient requires surgical procedures, which increases health risks for both the donor of the organ and the transplant recipient. In most cases, organ donors provide their crucial tissues and organs to other people prior to their death. Nevertheless, living people can frequently donate paired organs and like kidneys. The US government implements organ donation and transplantation using stringent standards and requirements (Cherry 52). In essence, organ donation offers recipients, who have limited chances of surviving from their ailments, a new chance to live. According to Farrell, Prince and Quigley (99), the demand for organ donation in the United States is increasing, with at least 112,000 individuals currently needing organ transplants. In aIDition, reported deaths associated with pending need for transplants have been increasing annually, which implies the significance of organ donation in saving lives. Green (56) argues that life itself seldom gives a person the extraordinary chance of sharing the valuable gift of life, and the significance of organ donation serves as an ultimate endowment upon humankind as a kindness gesture. Irrespective of an individuals viewpoint or religious perspective, it is apparent that organ donation plays an integral role in saving lives and relieving pain and emotional suffering via selfless compassion of other people. People should become organ donors because the reasons for organ donation are grounded in the apprehension for the wellness of others without an anticipated gratitude in return. Therefore, people should donate organs because it bestows life not only to transplant recipients, but also to the entire society, implying that organ donation is for the greater good of the society.
The first, fundamental reason for becoming an organ donor is that it gives the gift of extending the life of another person, which allows families to enjoy the cherished moments with their rather dying family members (Brezina 74). Organ donation facilitates a generous and kindhearted future because lessons associated with charity and decency is achieved through the contributions and lives of recipients of organ transplants. Cherry (89) argues that bestowing such a personal and a crucial gift to people in dire need establishes standards of empathy and love for future generations to emulate. The inference from this observation is that organ donation helps to improve the societal wellbeing of both the donor and the recipient. In fact, the primary justifications for organ donation are that it helps in saving lives through truly selfless charity. When a person donates an organ, he or she is giving another person the fighting chance to live. The United Network for Organ Sharing reports that organ transplants have helped in saving at least 450,000 lives in the United States alone; this can be helpful in reducing the number of deaths associated with patients waiting for organ transplants (Farrell, Prince and Quigley 101). Organ donation is a form of selfless charity that can benefit people in need. Patients waiting organ transplants are somewhat needy because most of them are facing needless suffering. The US Department of Health and Human Services acclaimed that 48,773 patients were in need of kidney transplants during 2007 (Green 65). Therefore, donating a single kidney goes a long way in eliminating death and human suffering associated with kidney failures such as reduced mental capabilities, fatal heart rhythm disturbances and organ failures.
Organ donation has significant benefits for both donors and their respective families, and transplant recipients (Siegel and Eusebio 89). Donors and their families benefit significantly from organ donation include the power of saving lives and the capability to console grieving families. According to Cherry (145), registering for organ donation is an instance of a charitable nothing that has no costs. The donor can save about eight lives by organ donation, and save or improve the lives of about 50 recipients by donating tissues. Donors also play a significant role in consoling grieving families because of the difficulties associated with the loss of a loved one. Most grieving families of people who donated organs or tissues console themselves in the fact that their loss was worth by saving or improving lives of other people (Green 99). Organ donation has significant benefits for transplant recipients through an improved quality of live and giving them a second chance to live. Organ transplants are helpful in reducing dependency on costly treatments for survival and allow the recipients to resume normal lifestyles. The identified benefits of organ donation to recipients and donors and their respective families are a justification of becoming an organ donor. Overall, it is evident that organ donation helps in improving the daily lives of recipients struggling with difficulties such as disabilities, pain and suffering. Without doubt, organ donation provides hope to recipients. For instance, organ transplant increase the hope that a person will live a full and productive life. This hope is necessary for the future wellbeing of the society. As a result, massive registration for organ donation is the key towards the future wellbeing of the society (Bramstedt 100).
Another reason for organ donation is the considerable demand for organ and tissue donors in the US. Donate Life America reports that there are at least 86 million registered eye, tissue and organ donors in the US; nevertheless, there are at least 106,000 people needing organ and tissue transplants (Farrell, Prince and Quigley 105). This disparity is because not every individual has the ability to donate. In aIDition, the disparity diminishes the hope of potential recipients for living a better future. Organ donation has a large impact on the lives of the recipients through saving and improving lives. A single donation can save and improve many lives at no cost. With the recent scientific advancements, doctors have the capability to harvest numerous tissues and organs from the departed donor. In aIDition, organ donation plays an integral role in advancing medical research, which in turn indirectly improves and saves many lives. The US Organ and Tissue Transplantation Department points out that tissue, organ or body donation to a research institute, university or a medical facility provides scientists with an opportunity to research some ailments and their impact on the human body. Advancing scientific research can lead to the discovery of treatment and cures for formerly undiscovered diseases (Farrell, Prince and Quigley 115).
The reasons used against organ donation vary according to the individual because it is mostly a personal decision. Some opponents of organ donation cite religious reasons for not donating organs, whereas others cite that their family beliefs disagree with the intent of becoming a donor. For instance, some religious affiliations hold the belief that donating organs could affect the afterlife of an individual. Similarly, organ donation serves to impair the hopes of recovery in one way or another. Other religions and individuals prefer cremation instead of donating tissues, organs and body. Secondly, opponents of organ donation cite the fear of unethical purchase and selling of organs. It is a fact that a black market exists for some organs such as kidneys. Unethical trade in organs is prevalent in Iran, Pakistan, China, Ukraine and Bosnia, where most of the people are poor. In the US, selling organs is outlawed. However, organ donation can be a powerful tool for curbing unethical trade of organs and tissues and its associated implications such as infection and transplant rejection. Bramstedt (112) argues that an increase in legitimate organ donation will play a considerable role in cutting the demand for transplant tourism, which would in turn lead to significant benefits for donors and recipients. Most Americans are not willing to donate organs simply because they lack the knowledge associated with the procedure. It is apparent that most of the perceived cons of donating organs are grounded on misconception. For example, many people falsely believe that they have to incur the cost of donating an organ or that their family will have to incur the expenses of organ removal (Green 114). This is a fallacy because organ donation is utterly free and all costs are transferred to the recipient. Similarly, many individuals are avoiding organ donation on the fear that it will have an impact on their medical treatment. They hold the belief that doctors cannot try their best to find them if they are discovered to be potential donors. Again, this is a fallacy because surgeons engaged in organ donations are not the same with those involved in saving patients. The fact is that the life of the patient in front of them is ultimately crucial. According to Brezina (114), another fallacy that discourages potential donors is the misconception that organ donation leads to medical complications for the case of the donor. The reality is that organ donation has not effect on the donors life even after recovering. For example, kidney donors do not face any complications because the remaining kidney enlarges and functions normally. The case is the same for liver donation because it can regenerate and get back to full operation (Cherry 121).
In conclusion, it is evident that pros of organ donation far outweigh the cons that are grounded on misinformation. The bottom line is that organ donation helps grieving families, saves and extends lives, and leads to an improved quality of life. In aIDition, organ donation is cost effective, and a form of social responsibility to save others. Reaping the benefits of organ donation begins by registering to be an organ donor, which is a personal decision.
Works Cited
Bramstedt, Katrina. The organ donor experience: Good samaritans and the meaning of altruism. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2011. Print.
Brezina, Corona. Organ donation: Risks, rewards, and research. New York: The Rosen Publishing Group, 2009. Print.
Cherry, Mark. Kidney For sale by owner: human organs, transplantation, and the market. Georgetown : Georgetown University Press, 2005. Print.
Farrell, Anne-Maree, David Prince and Muireann Quigley. Organ shortage: Ethics, law and pragmatism. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2011. Print.
Green, Reg. The gift that heals: Stories of hope, renewal and transformation through organ and tissue donation. Bloomington: AuthorHouse, 2007. Print.
Siegel, Jason and Alvaro Eusebio. Understanding organ donation: Applied behavioral science perspectives. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 2010. Print.
LDR 3302-21.01.01-1A24-S1, Organizational Theory and Behavior Unit III Essay Top of Form Bottom of Form…
Chapter 9 What are teratogens? Give 5 examples. Define each of these stages: Germinal, embryonic,…
You are a Financial Analyst that has been appointed to lead a team in the…
You are familiar with the ANA Code of Ethics and have a growing understanding of…
This week’s discussion will focus on management decision-making and control in two companies, American corporation…
Mary Rowlandson felt that the man who eventually came to own her, Quinnapin, was “the…