Milestone 1: Caring for Populations Milestone Community Windshield Survey Guidelines
Updated 4/27/2017
Purpose
The purpose of this assignment is to complete a direct observational assessment of a community in your area. This windshield survey will be the initial step in uncovering a community health problem in your area and identifying community dynamics. This problem will be further assessed in the following two assignments.
Course Outcomes
This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcome.
CO2: Assess the health needs of individuals, families, aggregates, and communities using demographic and epidemiological data to identify population health risks. (PO 4)
Due Date
Submit your completed windshield survey form by 11:59 p.m. MT Sunday of Week 2.
Points: 150 points
Directions
Guidelines
Below are the requirements needed for successful completion of the Windshield Survey Form.
Note: It is helpful to conduct this assessment at least two different times: during the day or evening, on a weekday and/or on the weekend. If possible, plan on asking someone to drive during your survey so that you can take notes.
Best Practices in Completing the Form
The following are best practices in preparing this project.
**Academic Integrity Reminder**
Chamberlain College of Nursing values honesty and integrity. All students should be aware of the Academic Integrity policy and follow it in all discussions and assignments.
By submitting this assignment, I pledge on my honor that all content contained is my own original work except as quoted and cited appropriately. I have not received any unauthorized assistance on this assignment.
Please see the grading criteria and rubrics on this page.
(Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.
Rubric
NR443_Milestone1
NR443_Milestone1
CriteriaRatingsPts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction of Community
view longer description
Community is identified and adequately described.
20.0 pts
Community is identified and briefly described.
18.0 pts
Community identified but description is insufficient.
16.0 pts
Community not identified and description is insufficient.
8.0 pts
Community is not identified or described.
0.0 pts
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWindshield Survey
view longer description
Community is assessed and findings adequately cover the six categories listed on form.
75.0 pts
Community is assessed in all categories but findings inadequate in one or two categories.
66.0 pts
Community is assessed but findings missing in one or two categories or inadequate in three or four categories.
60.0 pts
Community is assessed but findings missing in three or four categories or inadequate in five or more categories.
29.0 pts
Community is not assessed.
0.0 pts
75.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdentification of an aggregate or vulnerable population
view longer description
Thoroughly describes aggregate or vulnerable population with detailed observations about this population.
20.0 pts
Adequately describes aggregate or vulnerable population but observations about the population are brief and missing some details.
18.0 pts
Adequately identifies aggregate or vulnerable population but observations about the population are missing.
16.0 pts
Minimally describes aggregate or vulnerable population and observations about the population are missing.
8.0 pts
Aggregate or vulnerable population are not described.
0.0 pts
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion
view longer description
Conclusion includes a brief summary of the windshield survey findings and satisfactory identification of community health problems.
20.0 pts
Conclusion includes a brief summary of findings and identification of some community health problems.
18.0 pts
Conclusion includes a brief summary of findings or identification of health problems.
16.0 pts
Conclusion present but does not include a brief summary and problem identification missing.
8.0 pts
Conclusion not done.
0.0 pts
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics
view longer description
Excellent mechanics with minimal errors of the following: -correct grammar and spelling -writes logically in complete sentences -any references used are cited in text -all references listed in reference box using basics of APA formatting (hanging indent not needed)
15.0 pts
Good mechanics considering the elements listed in first column.
13.0 pts
Fair mechanics considering the elements listed in first column.
12.0 pts
Poor mechanics considering the elements listed in first column.
6.0 pts
Very poor mechanics such that assignment is difficult to read.
0.0 pts
15.0 pts
Total Points: 150.0
PreviousNext
LDR 3302-21.01.01-1A24-S1, Organizational Theory and Behavior Unit III Essay Top of Form Bottom of Form…
Chapter 9 What are teratogens? Give 5 examples. Define each of these stages: Germinal, embryonic,…
You are a Financial Analyst that has been appointed to lead a team in the…
You are familiar with the ANA Code of Ethics and have a growing understanding of…
This week’s discussion will focus on management decision-making and control in two companies, American corporation…
Mary Rowlandson felt that the man who eventually came to own her, Quinnapin, was “the…