HIM 615 Grand Canyon University Health Information Exchange Analysis Review The purpose of this assignment is to review the current state of development fo

HIM 615 Grand Canyon University Health Information Exchange Analysis Review The purpose of this assignment is to review the current state of development for your state’s health information exchange (HIE) and current participation rate.

Compare your state to three states with similar demographics. Write a 1,000-1,250 word summary related to the ability of your state’s HIE to share data and improve the following:

Coordination of care
Public health initiatives
Evidence-based research

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. Course Code
HIM-615
Class Code
HIM-615-O500
Criteria
Content
Percentage
70.0%
Comparison of State HIEs
10.0%
Coordination of Care
20.0%
Public Health Initiatives
20.0%
Evidence-Based Research
20.0%
Organization and Effectiveness
20.0%
Thesis Development and Purpose
7.0%
Argument Logic and Construction
8.0%
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling,
punctuation, grammar, language use)
5.0%
Format
10.0%
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the
major and assignment)
5.0%
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes,
references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to
assignment and style)
5.0%
Total Weightage
100%
Assignment Title
Health Information Exchange Analysis
Unsatisfactory (0.00%)
A comparison of three state HIEs is not included.
A description of HIE and its ability to share data and improve
the coordination of care is not included.
A description of HIE and its ability to share data and improve
the public health initiatives is not included.
A description of HIE and its ability to share data and improve
evidence-based research is not included.
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing
claim.
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The
conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is
incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede
communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or
sentence construction is used.
Template is not used appropriately or documentation format
is rarely followed correctly.
Sources are not documented.
Total Points
135.0
Less than Satisfactory (74.00%)
A comparison of three state HIEs is incomplete or incorrect.
A description of HIE and its ability to share data and improve
the coordination of care is incomplete or incorrect.
A description of HIE and its ability to share data and improve
the public health initiatives is incomplete or incorrect.
A description of HIE and its ability to share data and improve
evidence-based research is incomplete or incorrect.
Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not
clear.
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks
consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some
sources have questionable credibility.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the
reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word
choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not
varied.
Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing
or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as
appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous
formatting errors.
Satisfactory (79.00%)
A comparison of three state HIEs is included but lack details.
A description of HIE and its ability to share data and improve
the coordination of care is included but lack details.
A description of HIE and its ability to share data and improve
the public health initiatives is included but lack details.
A description of HIE and its ability to share data and improve
evidence-based research is included but lack details.
Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The
argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument
logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources
used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the
thesis.
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are
not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied
sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are
employed.
Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although
some minor errors may be present.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and
style, although some formatting errors may be present.
Good (87.00%)
A comparison of three state HIEs is complete and includes
supporting detail.
A description of HIE and its ability to share data and improve
the coordination of care is complete and includes supporting
detail.
A description of HIE and its ability to share data and improve
the public health initiatives is complete and includes
supporting detail.
A description of HIE and its ability to share data and improve
evidence-based research is complete and includes supporting
detail.
Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper.
Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and
appropriate to the purpose.
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The
argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument
logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources
used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the
thesis.
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may
be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence
structures and figures of speech.
Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no
errors in formatting style.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and
style, and format is mostly correct.
Excellent (100.00%)
A comparison of three state HIEs is extremely thorough and
includes substantial detail.
A description of HIE and its ability to share data and improve
the coordination of care is extremely thorough and includes
substantial detail.
A description of HIE and its ability to share data and improve
the public health initiatives is extremely thorough and
includes substantial detail.
A description of HIE and its ability to share data and improve
evidence-based research is extremely thorough and includes
substantial detail.
Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the
paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper
clear.
Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive
claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are
authoritative.
Comments
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic
English.
All format elements are correct.
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as
appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of
error.
Points Earned

Purchase answer to see full
attachment