BUSI 740 Liberty University Dell and HC Starck Case Studies This task contains two separate assignments. I do not want you to join them together, neither d

BUSI 740 Liberty University Dell and HC Starck Case Studies This task contains two separate assignments. I do not want you to join them together, neither do I want you to join their references together. Prepare two seperate word documents and title them accordingly. You are to also reference the book, Managing the Supply Chain by Simchi-Levi et al. (Chapters 5 and 6). You need these chapters and the reference requirements in the rubric, the discussion forum, and the study case 2. Please see attached documents for more information Case Studies 2, 3, and 4 Grading Rubric
Criteria
Content 70%
Synthesis of
Knowledge
Focus/Thesis
30%
Levels of Achievement
Advanced
27to 25points*
Proficient
24to 23points*
Developing
22to 1 points*
Not present
0 points
Student exhibits a
defined and clear
understanding of the
assignment. Thesis is
clearly defined and
well constructed to
help guide the reader
throughout the
assignment. Student
builds upon the thesis
of the assignment with
well-documented and
exceptional supporting
facts, figures, and/or
statements.
Establishes a good
comprehension of topic
and in the building of
the thesis. Student
demonstrates an
effective presentation of
thesis, with most
support statements
helping to support the
key focus of assignment
Student exhibits a basic
understanding of the
intended assignment, but
the thesis is not fully
supported throughout the
assignment. While thesis
helps to guide the
development of the
assignment, the reader
may have some difficulty
in seeing linkages
between thoughts. While
student has included a
few supporting facts and
statements, this has
limited the quality of the
assignment
15to 1 points*
0 points
18to17points*
Foundation of
Knowledge
20%
Student demonstrates
proficient command of
the subject matter in
the assignment.
Assignment shows an
impressive level of
depth of student’s
ability to relate course
16points*
Student exhibits aboveaverage usage of subject
matter in assignment.
Student provides aboveaverage ability in
relating course content
in examples given.
Details and facts
The assignment reveals
that the student has a
general, fundamental
understanding of the
course material. There
are areas of some
concern in the linkages
provided between facts
content to practical
examples and
applications. Student
provides
comprehensive
analysis of details,
facts, and concepts in a
logical sequence.
18to 17points*
Application of
Knowledge
Student demonstrates a
(Critical Thinking higher level of critical
Skills
thinking necessary for
graduate-level work.
20%
Student provides a
strategic approach in
presenting examples of
problem solving or
critical thinking, while
drawing logical
conclusions, which are
not immediately
obvious. Student
provides wellsupported ideas and
reflection with a
variety of current
and/or world views in
the assignment.
Student presents a
genuine intellectual
development of ideas
presented provide an
adequate presentation
of student’s current
level of subject matter
knowledge.
and supporting
statements. Student
generally explains
concepts, but only meets
the minimum
requirements in this area.
16points*
15 to 1 points*
Student exhibits a good
command of criticalthinking skills in the
presentation of material
and supporting
statements. Assignment
demonstrates the
student’s above-average
use of relating concepts
by using a variety of
factors. Overall, student
provides adequate
conclusions, with 2 or
fewer errors.
Student takes a common,
conventional approach in
guiding the reader
through various linkages
and connections
presented in assignment.
Student presents a
limited perspective on
key concepts throughout
assignment. Student
appears to have problems
applying information in a
problem-solving manner.
0 points
throughout
assignment.
Structure 30%
Organization of
Ideas Format
10%
Advanced
9points*
Student thoroughly
understands and excels
at explaining all major
points. An original,
unique, and/or
imaginative approach
to overall ideas,
concepts, and findings
is presented. Overall
format of assignment
includes an
appropriate
introduction (or
abstract), welldeveloped paragraphs,
and conclusion.
Finished assignment
demonstrates student’s
Proficient
8points*
Student explains the
majority of points and
concepts in the
assignment. Student
demonstrates a good
skill level in formatting
and organizing material
in assignment. Student
presents an aboveaverage level of
preparedness, with few
formatting errors.
Developing
7 to 1 points*
Student applies some
points and concepts
incorrectly. Student uses
a variety of formatting
styles, with some
inconsistencies
throughout the paper.
Assignment does not
have a continuous
pattern of logical
sequencing.
Not present
0 points
Writing Skill
10%
Research Skill
10%
ability to plan and
organize research in a
logical sequence.
9points*
8points*
Student demonstrates
an excellent command
of grammar, as well as
presents research in a
clear and concise
writing style. Presents
a thorough, extensive
understanding of word
usage. Student excels in
the selection and
development of a wellplanned research
assignment.
Assignment is errorfree and reflects
student’s ability to
prepare graduate-level
writing for possible
publication in a peerreviewed (refereed)
journal.
9points*
Student provides an
effective display of good
writing and grammar.
Assignment reflects
student’s ability to
select appropriate word
usage and presents an
above-average
presentation of a given
topic or issue.
Assignment appears to
be well written with no
more than 3 errors.
Student provides a good
final product that covers
the above-minimal
requirements.
Student provides
sophisticated synthesis
of complex body of
information in the
Student achieves an
above-average
synthesis of research,
but interpretation is
8points*
7 to 1 points*
0 points
Assignment reflects basic
writing and grammar, but
with more than 3 errors.
Key terms and concepts
are somewhat vague and
not completely explained
by student. Student uses a
basic vocabulary in
assignment. Student’s
writing ability is average,
but demonstrates a basic
understanding of the
subject matter.
7 to 1 points*
Assignment provides a
basic, but borderline,
perspective of student’s
research abilities. Student
0 points
preparation of
assignment. Research
provided by student
contributes
significantly to the
development of the
overall thesis. Student
incorporates at least 5
quality references in
assignment. Student
incorporates a variety
of research resources
and methodology in the
preparation of
assignment.
Instructor Comments
Raw Score 90
narrow in scope and
description within
assignment. Assignment
contains less than 4
resources, and presents
an average overview of
key concepts.
has incorporated less
than 3 sources, which
does not attempt to cover
key elements of
assignment.
BUSI 740
CASE STUDY 2INSTRUCTIONS
Read the Dell Inc.: Improving the Flexibility of the Desktop PC Supply Chain CaseStudy in
theSimchi-Levi et al. text. Submit a response to each of the end-of-case discussion questions.
Each question must be answered thoroughly, and responses must be supported by the concepts
introduced in the reading/study materials. Each question/answer must be delineated under a
heading in current APA format. Include a title page and reference page also in current APA
format. Incorporate a minimum of 5 peer-reviewed sources with at least 1 source per question.
Submit this assignment by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Sunday of Module/Week 3.
BUSI 740
DISCUSSION BOARD FORUM 2 INSTRUCTIONS
Thread
Read the H.C. Starck, Inc. Case Study in the Simchi-Levi et al. text. Submit a thread of 700
words and respond to each of the 3 end-of-case discussion questions. Each question must be
answered thoroughly and responses must be supported by the concepts introduced in the
reading/study materials. Provide a brief description of the concepts and the significance of
the concepts to practice in general, as well as what problems might be resolved through
successful implementation of the concepts. Support your thread by citing at least 2 peerreviewed journal articles. Your thread must be in current APA format and must include a
reference list, and each question/answer must be delineated under an APA heading.
Submit your thread by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Sunday of Module/Week 3.
Replies
Submit replies of at least 250 words each to at least 2 other students. Each reply must
demonstrate a substantive discussion that meets grading rubric specification.
Submit your replies by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Sunday of Module/Week 4.
BUSI 740
Criteria
Content
Quality of
Information
Structure
Professional
Language
DiscussionBoard Forum Threads Grading Rubric
Levels of Achievement
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
39 to 42points
37 to 38points
1to 36points
All questions are
Most questions are
answered in a wellQuestions are not
answered in a wellthought-out manner.
answered in a wellthought-out manner.
thought-out manner.
Advanced
12points
Professional
vocabulary and writing
style are used
consistently
throughout the
discussion.
Instructor Comments
Proficient
10 to 11points
Developing
1 to 9 points
Professional vocabulary
Professional vocabulary and writing style are
and writing style are
occasionally used.
used frequently
throughout the
discussion.
Not present
0 points
Not present
0 points

Purchase answer to see full
attachment