Will People Lose Their Jobs Due to Computers Doing the Job Better Paper Research Paper: Each student is required to write a major paper on a topic from thi

Will People Lose Their Jobs Due to Computers Doing the Job Better Paper Research Paper: Each student is required to write a major paper on a topic from this course that is of interest to you. TOPICWill people lose their jobs due to computers doing the job better? (Why or why not? How)**must be Information Technology related**This paper must be 12 to 15 pages in length (typewritten and double-spaced, 12-point font with 1-inch margins) **excluding bibliography, table of contents, graphics, tabular or illustrative material****References should include current sources and must conform to APA style. The paper is expected to meet graduate-level standards and be suitable for publication in a professional journal. You should research at least 20 external references such as academic journal /conference papers, trade journals, short videos and relevant websites for your paper. At least 12 of these references must be from peer-reviewed journals or conferences only. **Use of Wikipedia or the class text as a reference will cause a serious LOSS of points. **References must include the published journal/conference name and information, NOT a URL where the paper was found. **Grading rubric for the research paper is available** Research Paper
Research Paper: Each student is required to write a major paper on a topic from this course that is of
interest to you.
TOPIC
•
Will people lose their jobs due to computers doing the job better? (Why or why not? How)
o **must be Information Technology related**
1. This paper must be 12 to 15 pages in length (typewritten and double-spaced, 12-point font with 1inch margins) **excluding bibliography, table of contents, graphics, tabular or illustrative material**
2. **References should include current sources and must conform to APA style.
3. The paper is expected to meet graduate-level standards and be suitable for publication in a
professional journal.
4. You should research at least 20 external references such as academic journal /conference papers,
trade journals, short videos and relevant websites for your paper.
5. At least 12 of these references must be from peer-reviewed journals or conferences only.
6. **Use of Wikipedia or the class text as a reference will cause a serious LOSS of points.
7. **References must include the published journal/conference name and information, NOT a URL
where the paper was found.
**Grading rubric for the research paper is available**
CIS 5311 – Spring 2019 Research Paper Rubric
Research Paper Rubric
Criteria
Unsatisfactory Beginning
Developing
Accomplished
Paper
Focus:
Purpose/
Position
Statement
0-13 points
14-15 points
16-17 points
Identifies a
research topic
but may be too
broad in scope
and/or the thesis
is somewhat
unclear and
needs to be
developed
further. Focal
point is not
consistently
maintained
throughout the
paper.
Identifies a relevant
research topic and a
thesis that provides
adequate direction for
the paper with some
degree of interest for
the reader. The thesis
states the position,
premise, or hypothesis,
and is the focal point of
the paper for the most
part.
0-22 points
21-23 points
24-26 points
Demonstrates a
lack of
understanding and
inadequate
analysis of the
research topic and
thesis. Analysis is
superficial based
on opinions and
preferences rather
than critical
analysis.
Demonstrates
general
understanding
with limited
critical analysis of
the research
topic and thesis
(argument).
Summarizes
perspectives,
counterarguments, or
opposing
positions.
Demonstrates an
understanding and
some critical analysis of
the research topic and
thesis (argument).
Adequately
compares/contrasts
perspectives, counterarguments, or opposing
positions but broader
connections and/or
implications are not as
thoroughly explored.
0-22 points
21-23 points
24-26 points
Lacks sufficient
research sources
to support the
central position
and/or, if included,
are generally not
relevant, accurate,
or reliable.
Contains
Provides some
evidence to
support the
central position
with only a few
research sources.
Some sources
may not be
relevant,
Analysis
Evidence
(Sources)
Fails to identify a
relevant research
topic or is not
clearly defined
and/or the paper
lacks focus
throughout.
Provides essential,
accurate evidence to
support the central
position with the
required (7) research
sources including 1
source from a
periodical database
that are mostly
Exemplary
18-20 points
Total
/20
Identifies a
relevant research
topic and a thesis
that provides
direction for the
paper that is
engaging and
thought provoking,
The thesis clearly
and concisely
states the position,
premise, or
hypothesis and is
consistently the
focal point
throughout the
paper.
27-30 points
/30
Demonstrates a
sophisticated
understanding and
careful, critical
analysis of the
research topic and
thesis (argument).
Compares/contras
ts perspectives,
considers counter
arguments or
opposing
positions, and
draws original and
thoughtful
conclusions with
future
implications.
27-30 points
Provides
compelling and
accurate evidence
to support indepth the central
position beyond
the required (7)
research sources
with at least 1
/30
CIS 5311 – Spring 2019 Research Paper Rubric
Organizat
ion
Writing
Quality &
Adherenc
e to
Format
Guideline
s
numerous factual
mistakes,
omissions, or
oversimplifications
. Sources, if
included, are not
properly
referenced and
cited in the paper.
accurate, and
reliable and/or
appropriately
referenced and
cited in the
paper.
relevant, accurate, and
reliable. Sources are
referenced and cited
appropriately
throughout the paper
for the most part.
Unsatisfactory Beginning
Developing
Accomplished
0-6 points
7 points
8 points
Paper lacks logical
organization and
impedes readers’
comprehension of
ideas. Central
position is rarely
evident from
paragraph to
paragraph and/or
the paper is
missing multiple
required
components.
Paper is
somewhat
organized,
although
occasionally ideas
from paragraph
to paragraph may
not flow well
and/or connect
to the central
position or be
clear as a whole.
May be missing a
required
component
and/or
components may
be less than
complete.
Paper is adequately
organized. Ideas are
arranged reasonably
with a progression of
thought from
paragraph to paragraph
connecting to the
central position.
Includes required
components
(introduction, body,
conclusion, Reference
List, etc.) for the most
part.
0-6 points
7 points
8 points
Paper shows a
below
average/poor
writing style
lacking in
elements of
appropriate
standard English
and following
proper APA
guidelines.
Frequent errors in
spelling, grammar,
punctuation,
spelling, usage,
and/or formatting.
Paper shows an
average and/or
casual writing
style using
standard English
and following
APA guidelines.
Some errors in
spelling,
grammar,
punctuation,
usage, and/or
formatting.
Paper shows above
average writing style
and clarity in writing
using standard English
and following APA
guidelines. Minor errors
in grammar,
punctuation, spelling,
usage, and/or
formatting.
source from a
periodical
database.
Research sources
are highly
relevant, accurate,
and reliable and
add to the
strength of the
paper; and are
effectively
referenced and
cited throughout
the paper.
Exemplary
9-10 points
Total
/10
Paper is effectively
organized. Ideas
are arranged
logically, flow
smoothly, with a
strong progression
of thought from
paragraph to
paragraph
connecting to the
central position.
Includes all
required
components
(introduction,
body, conclusion,
Reference List,
etc.).
9-10 points
/10
Paper is well
written and clear
using APA
guidelines and
standard English
characterized by
elements of a
strong writing
style. Basically free
from grammar,
punctuation,
spelling, usage, or
formatting errors.
TOTAL POINTS (sum of 6 Criteria)
/100

Purchase answer to see full
attachment