Police Brutality/Ethical Case analysis Need some help! Analysis of Ethical Dilemma Case PLEASE NOTE: · PLEASE MAKE SURE YOU USE AT LEAST 8 CREDIBLE SOURC

Police Brutality/Ethical Case analysis Need some help! Analysis of Ethical Dilemma Case

PLEASE NOTE:
·
PLEASE MAKE SURE YOU USE AT LEAST 8 CREDIBLE SOURCES

·
I want to you to write this paper based on police brutality in the United States

There are technically two parts to this project 8 PAGES TOTAL!

PART 1

1. an original case study on a topic of interest to the student accompanied by, and
2. an analysis or interpretation of the case.
Though both parts are presented in one document. The case may either be a dilemma that you have experienced as a public administrator, or one confronted by someone who works in the government.
If the latter, you will need to conduct at least one thorough interview with the person involved. In the analysis process, you should demonstrate your ability to apply Cooper’s ethical decision-making model to a real-world case and incorporate course readings to make suggestions for necessary organizational changes.
The case and its analysis is expected to be no longer than ten pages double spaced in 12 point times new roman font with 1 inch margins. In addition, you should follow the below criteria.

How to develop your case:
1. The case must focus on ethics
For this assignment, the central problem or dilemma at the core of the case study must be
ethical in nature. It must concern questions of right vs. wrong, justice, or morality. The
problem should be relatively complex in that it could be resolved in a number of equally
plausible and defensible ways. No simple answers are acceptable as the obvious “easy”
solutions offer no lessons for us.

2. The ethical problem must concern the public sector

This could involve a conflict of interest, dereliction of duty, personal vs. professional role
conflict, malfeasance, whistleblowing, any number of issues commonly found in the
public sector today. The problem could derive from your personal experience, a news
clip or hearsay. It can be fictional or hypothetical so long as it offers lessons about
how ethical conduct should occur in the public sector.

3. It is advisable to center your case on a public sector employee

You should consider personalizing the problem by making the dilemma the responsibility
of one or more civil servants or public officials. A particular city planner who risks
losing a job through a superior’s questionable orders is much easier to identify with than
a general, vague scenario. Readers need to see that the dilemma you
describe could conceivably happen to them. How would they react? What course of
action might they consider in that situation? Personalizing the case enables us to probe
and explore the dilemma more easily and to its fullest extent.

4. Lay out the characters, their beliefs, actions and events leading up to the dilemma

Who did what to whom? How, in what manner, did this happen? Was their background
to these events? Why does a central figure find this a problem? Or don’t they see it as a problem until it’s too late? What options does he or she have? What are the positives for someone’s
actions? The negatives? What happens if he does nothing? And so on.
5. Conclude the case with questions
Like many cases we read in this course, questions following the case can lead the reader
to what’s important. Without providing easy answers, questions draw the reader’s
attention to particular issues or sides of the problem. As an example, what if Jane’s
supervisor, Harry, didn’t request this action but Harry’s supervisor did? What happens if
the law and the agency’s code of ethics would approve Jane doing X but her personal
beliefs and values dictate against this? Naturally, your case questions will depend on the
dilemma you’ve drawn.

PART 2

6. Analyze the case (Part II)
While the case lays out the characters, their beliefs, actions and events responsible for the
ethical problem, the case analysis interprets or analyzes those events. Consider the case

itself as Part I, the analysis as Part II. Because ethical issues in real life are thorny or
complex, their complex nature means they must be capable of being analyzed from at
least two – and preferably more perspectives. A case which examines a potential
conflict of interest might be viewed and resolved one way when regarded from a
utilitarian perspective and in quite a different manner when viewed from a principled
perspective. The law may require one course of action; a particular ethics perspective
would prescribe another, and so on.

The analysis (Part II) will describe how the student
sees the case as offering lessons in public service ethics. Restating from above, you should demonstrate your ability to apply Cooper’s ethical decision-making model to a real-world case and incorporate course readings to make suggestions for necessary organizational changes.

Analysis of Ethical Dilemma Case

PLE

ASE

NOTE:

·

PLEASE

MAKE SURE YOU

USE

AT LEAST 8

CREDIBLE SOURCES

·

I want to you to write this paper

based on police

brutality

in the

Un

ited S

tates

There are technically two parts to this project

8

PA

GES TOTAL!

PART

1

1.

an original case study on a topic of interest to t

he student accompanied by, and

2.

an analysis or interpretation of the case.

Though both parts are presented in one document. The case may either be a dilemma that you have

experienced as a public administrator, or one confronted by someone who works in

the government.

If the latter, you will need to conduct at least one thorough interview with the person involved. In the

analysis process, you should demonstrate your ability to apply Cooper’s ethical decision

–

making model

to a real

–

world case and incorp

orate course readings to make suggestions for necessary organizational

changes.

The case and its analysis is expected to be no longer than ten pages double spaced in 12 point times new

roman font with 1 inch margins. In addition, you should follow the bel

ow criteria.

How to develop your case:

1.

The case must focus on ethics

For this assignment, the central problem or dilemma at the core of the case study must be

ethical in nature. It must concern questions of right vs. wrong, justice, or morality. The

p

roblem should be relatively complex in that it could be resolved in a number of equally

plausible and defensible ways. No simple answers are acceptable as the obvious “easy”

solutions offer no lessons for us.

2.

The ethical problem must concern the public

sector

This could involve a conflict of interest, dereliction of duty, personal vs. professional role

conflict, malfeasance, whistleblowing, any number of issues commonly found in the

Analysis of Ethical Dilemma Case

PLEASE NOTE:
 PLEASE MAKE SURE YOU USE AT LEAST 8 CREDIBLE SOURCES
 I want to you to write this paper based on police brutality in the United States

There are technically two parts to this project 8 PAGES TOTAL!

PART 1
1. an original case study on a topic of interest to the student accompanied by, and
2. an analysis or interpretation of the case.
Though both parts are presented in one document. The case may either be a dilemma that you have
experienced as a public administrator, or one confronted by someone who works in the government.
If the latter, you will need to conduct at least one thorough interview with the person involved. In the
analysis process, you should demonstrate your ability to apply Cooper’s ethical decision-making model
to a real-world case and incorporate course readings to make suggestions for necessary organizational
changes.
The case and its analysis is expected to be no longer than ten pages double spaced in 12 point times new
roman font with 1 inch margins. In addition, you should follow the below criteria.

How to develop your case:
1. The case must focus on ethics
For this assignment, the central problem or dilemma at the core of the case study must be
ethical in nature. It must concern questions of right vs. wrong, justice, or morality. The
problem should be relatively complex in that it could be resolved in a number of equally
plausible and defensible ways. No simple answers are acceptable as the obvious “easy”
solutions offer no lessons for us.

2. The ethical problem must concern the public sector
This could involve a conflict of interest, dereliction of duty, personal vs. professional role
conflict, malfeasance, whistleblowing, any number of issues commonly found in the