NUR 514 Grand Canyon University Self Assessment Reflection Paper Self-Assessment Reflection Becoming self-aware is an ongoing process requiring introspect

NUR 514 Grand Canyon University Self Assessment Reflection Paper Self-Assessment Reflection

Becoming self-aware is an ongoing process requiring introspection. The more often people practice self-reflection, the more opportunities they have to understand their own behaviors and adapt their approaches to working with other people, which can improve both your own and other’s abilities to meet their professional goals. Using the following Self assessment result:

A. Personality Assessment:

b. Learning Styles Assessment

c. Values Assessment

In a 1,000 word reflective essay, address the following:

Briefly summarize why you selected each self-assessment and the results you obtained on each assessment.
Identify the leadership style that closely aligns to your philosophy of care, and explain what appeals to you about that style.
Reflect on how you might incorporate elements of that particular style as you exercise leadership in a practice or health care organization setting.
Discuss any particular areas for improvement the assessments helped you identify and some steps for improving your leadership capabilities.

You are required to cite five sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide,

5 APA Citation Reference in the Last 5 years and with Nursing content appropriate for the assignment. 3/9/2020
Yahoo Mail – Your test results (and more!)
Your test results (and more!)
From: 16Personalities (notifications@16personalities.com)
To:
kennykoga@yahoo.com
Date: Monday, March 9, 2020, 03:29 PM EDT
Your test results
Thank you for completing our personality test! Here is a copy of your
results:
Personality type: “The Consul” (ESFJ-A)
Individual traits: Extraverted – 85%, Observant – 72%, Feeling – 75%,
Judging – 83%, Assertive – 92%
Role: Sentinel
Strategy: People Mastery
Link to your profile:
https://www.16personalities.com/profiles/6055cea455781
You can also access your profile on our website by using the combination
of your email address and this password: 46c237a0
View your profile
Learn more (and save)!
If you’d like to learn more about the Consul personality type, check out our
Consul premium profile and Academy. They offer advice, exercises, and
additional tests designed to help you understand and master your
personality.
1/3
3/9/2020
Yahoo Mail – Your test results (and more!)
Oh, and as a little thank-you for scrolling down this far, here’s a discount
code you can use to get 20% off the first two premium options:
LEARNANDGROW
Get the Premium Profile
Did you know…
Finally, here are some cool Consul insights from our research. According to
our surveys, Consuls are the most likely personality type to…
…be satisfied with their life
…seek commitment in their relationships
…enjoy teaching or mentoring others
…have good handwriting
…remember birthdays easily
You can find our surveys in Articles & Surveys > Surveys, or by clicking
here. Check them out when you have a moment – they are a great way to
compare your habits, goals, and attitudes with other Consuls.
Until next time!
The 16Personalities Team
This message was sent from a notification-only e-mail address that is not actively monitored. If
you would like to get in touch with us, please e-mail support@16personalities.com instead. Thank
you!
NERIS Analytics Limited
6 New Street Square
London, EC4A 3DJ
United Kingdom
2/3
3/9/2020
Yahoo Mail – Your test results (and more!)
Registered in England and Wales, # 8646330
https://www.16personalities.com
3/3
Course Code
Class Code
NUR-514-O500
Criteria
Content
Percentage
70.0%
Summary of Self-Assessment Results
10.0%
A Specific Leadership Style That You Believe
Aligns With Your Philosophy of Care, Including
Appeal
20.0%
Reflection on How to Incorporate Elements of
the Leadership Style
15.0%
Areas for Self-Improvement, Including Steps to
Improve Leadership Capabilities
20.0%
Required Sources
5.0%
Organization and Effectiveness
20.0%
Thesis Development and Purpose
7.0%
Argument Logic and Construction
8.0%
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling,
punctuation, grammar, language use)
5.0%
Format
10.0%
Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the
major and assignment)
5.0%
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes,
references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to
assignment and style)
5.0%
Total Weightage
100%
Assignment Title
Leadership Style Reflective Essay
Unsatisfactory (0.00%)
A summary of why each self-assessment was selected and the
results obtained on each assessment is not included.
A discussion of a specific leadership style that you believe
aligns with your philosophy of care, including appeal, is not
included.
A reflection on how to incorporate elements of the
leadership style is not included.
A discussion of areas for self-improvement, including steps to
improve leadership capabilities, is not included.
Sources are not included.
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing
claim.
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The
conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is
incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede
communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or
sentence construction is used.
Template is not used appropriately or documentation format
is rarely followed correctly.
Sources are not documented.
Total Points
125.0
Less than Satisfactory (80.00%)
A summary of why each self-assessment was selected and the
results obtained on each assessment is present, but it lacks
detail or is incomplete.
A discussion of a specific leadership style that you believe
aligns with your philosophy of care, including appeal, is
present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.
A reflection on how to incorporate elements of the
leadership style is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.
A discussion of areas for self-improvement, including steps to
improve leadership capabilities, is present, but it lacks detail
or is incomplete.
Number of required sources is only partially met.
Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not
clear.
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks
consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some
sources have questionable credibility.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the
reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word
choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not
varied.
Template is used, but some elements are missing or
mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as
appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous
formatting errors.
Satisfactory (88.00%)
A summary of why each self-assessment was selected and the
results obtained on each assessment is present.
A discussion of a specific leadership style that you believe
aligns with your philosophy of care, including appeal, is
present.
A reflection on how to incorporate elements of the
leadership style is present.
A discussion of areas for self-improvement, including steps to
improve leadership capabilities, is present.
Number of required sources is met, but sources are outdated
or inappropriate.
Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The
argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument
logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources
used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the
thesis.
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are
not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied
sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are
employed.
Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some
minor errors may be present.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and
style, although some formatting errors may be present.
Good (92.00%)
A summary of why each self-assessment was selected and the
results obtained on each assessment is clearly provided and
well developed.
A discussion of a specific leadership style that you believe
aligns with your philosophy of care, including appeal, is
clearly provided and well developed.
A reflection on how to incorporate elements of the
leadership style is clearly provided and well developed.
A discussion of areas for self-improvement, including steps to
improve leadership capabilities, is clearly provided and well
developed.
Number of required sources is met. Sources are current, but
not all sources are appropriate for the assignment criteria
and nursing content.
Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper.
Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and
appropriate to the purpose.
Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of
argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of
claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are
authoritative.
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may
be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence
structures and figures of speech.
Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in
formatting style.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and
style, and format is mostly correct.
Excellent (100.00%)
A comprehensive summary of why each self-assessment was
selected and the results obtained on each assessment is
thoroughly developed with supporting details.
A comprehensive discussion of a specific leadership style that
you believe aligns with your philosophy of care, including
appeal, is thoroughly developed with supporting details.
A comprehensive reflection on how to incorporate elements
of the leadership style is thoroughly developed with
supporting details.
A comprehensive discussion of areas for self-improvement,
including steps to improve leadership capabilities, is
thoroughly developed with supporting details.
Number of required resources is met. Sources are current,
and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing
content.
Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the
paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper
clear.
Comments
Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive
claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are
authoritative.
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic
English.
All format elements are correct.
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as
appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of
error.
Points Earned

Purchase answer to see full
attachment