Cuyamaca College The Disputed Deere Business Law Case Analysis The Case of the Disputed Deere FACTS At a farm auction in Georgia, Dick Perez and Anna Lar

Cuyamaca College The Disputed Deere Business Law Case Analysis The Case of the Disputed Deere

FACTS

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Cuyamaca College The Disputed Deere Business Law Case Analysis The Case of the Disputed Deere FACTS At a farm auction in Georgia, Dick Perez and Anna Lar
Get an essay WRITTEN FOR YOU, Plagiarism free, and by an EXPERT!
Order Essay

At a farm auction in Georgia, Dick Perez and Anna Lara bid against each other on a Deere II tractor, and Dick bought it for $65,000. At a second auction the same day, Dick bought some equipment that he wanted to add to the tractor. He again encountered Anna, and the two agreed that Anna would install the new equipment. Anna took the tractor to her place of business to work on it.

Later, Dick came to the shop and paid $6,000 for Anna to do the work. Anna, in fact, was a dealer in farm machinery. She regularly bought such equipment at auctions, then repaired and sold it. Dick testified though that Anna’s shop appeared to him to be a repair shop and not a sales store.

Jorge’s Auction Services had done business with Anna in the past on a regular basis. Jorge’s wanted to buy the Deere II tractor in Anna’s store for the next auction. Anna executed a standard pre-auction document declaring that she owned the Deere II tractor. The state of Georgia does not require ownership papers for a tractor. Jorge’s bought the Deere II tractor from Anna for $30,000. When Dick learned of this, he demanded the tractor back, but Jorge’s refused.

AT TRIAL

Dick argued that Jorge’s never acquired good title to the Deere II tractor as Anna was never given title to the tractor. Anna was entrusted with the tractor for the purpose of repairs. Jorge’s argued that they had frequently purchased equipment from Anna under the same terms and conditions as when they bought the tractor. Therefore, they owned the tractor.

QUESTIONS

Who owns the Deere tractor at time of trial?

Why? What is the legal theory(ies) used to win the case?

Is there anything the loser in this case could have done differently at the time of the

transactions that might have made them the winner?

MUST REFERENCE THE TEXT (here is a free link)

https://www.worldcat.org/title/business-law-text-exercises/oclc/1064035290/viewport

superadmin

Recent Posts

LDR 3302-21.01.01-1A24-S1, Organizational Theory and Behavior

LDR 3302-21.01.01-1A24-S1, Organizational Theory and Behavior Unit III Essay Top of Form Bottom of Form…

3 years ago

Psychology Question | My Essay Helpers

Chapter 9 What are teratogens? Give 5 examples. Define each of these stages: Germinal, embryonic,…

3 years ago

Financial Market Analysis | My Essay Helpers

You are a Financial Analyst that has been appointed to lead a team in the…

3 years ago

Decision theory | My Essay Helpers

This week’s discussion will focus on management decision-making and control in two companies, American corporation…

3 years ago

Literature Question | My Essay Helpers

Mary Rowlandson felt that the man who eventually came to own her, Quinnapin, was “the…

3 years ago