Arizona State University U.S. History Colonization Discussion kindly check the attached files and follow the instruction for the paperKindly follow the rub

Arizona State University U.S. History Colonization Discussion kindly check the attached files and follow the instruction for the paperKindly follow the rubric attached US History Project Paper 1
Ratings
Criteria
This criterion is linked
to a learning
outcomePurpose
This criterion is linked
to a learning
outcomeOrganization
This criterion is linked
10.0 Pts
7.0 Pts
The writer’s central
purpose or argument is
readily apparent to the
reader.
The writing has a clear purpose
or argument, but may
sometimes digress from it.
10.0 Pts
7.0 Pts
The ideas are arranged
logically to support the
purpose or argument.
They flow smoothly from
one to another and are
clearly linked to each
other. The reader can
follow the line of
reasoning.
The ideas are arranged logically
to support the central purpose
or argument. They are usually
clearly linked to each other. For
the most part, the reader can
follow the line of reasoning.
10.0 Pts
7.0 Pts
This criterion is linked
to a learning
outcomeSentence
Structure
This criterion is linked
to a learning
outcomeWord Choice
This criterion is linked
to a learning
outcomeGrammar
Sentences are wellphrased and varied in
length and structure.
They flow smoothly from
one to another.
Sentences are well-phrased and
there is some variety in length
and structure. The flow from
sentence to sentence is generally
smooth.
10.0 Pts
7.0 Pts
Word choice is
consistently precise and
accurate.
Word choice is generally good.
The writer often goes beyond
the generic word to find one
more precise and effective
10.0 Pts
7.0 Pts
Spelling, Writing
Mechanics
(punctuation, italics,
capitalization, etc.)
This criterion is linked
to a learning
outcomeLength of
Paper
This criterion is linked
to a learning
outcomeQuality of
References
The writing is free or
almost free of errors.
There are occasional errors, but
they don’t represent a major
distraction or obscure meaning.
10.0 Pts
7.0 Pts
Paper is the number of
pages specified in the
assignment.
Paper is a page short of the
assignment requirements.
10.0 Pts
7.0 Pts
References + usage of a
minimum of 3 sources
(Did you use one
primary source
document?)
This criterion is linked
to a learning
outcomeUse of
Chicago Style Citations
References are primarily
peer-reviewed
professional journals or
other approved sources
(e.g., government
documents, agency
manuals, …). The reader
is confident that the
information and ideas
can be trusted.
Although most of the references
Are professionally legitimate, a
few are questionable (e.g., trade
books, unreliable internet
sources, popular magazines, …).
The reader is uncertain of the
reliability of some of the sources
10.0 Pts
7.0 Pts
Chicago Style format is
used accurately and
consistently in the paper
and on the “Works
Cited” page.
Chicago format is used with
minor errors.
This criterion is linked
to a learning
outcomeCoverage of
the 3 Required Subject
Areas (For paper 1:
Events leading up to
the Revolution, the
Revolution itself, and
the formation of the US
as an independent
country)
This criterion is linked
to a learning
outcomeILO 2A:
Explore
40.0 Pts
29.0 Pts
Demonstrates a good
understanding of each
topic.
Demonstrates a basic
understanding of the topics
selected.
2.0 Pts
1.0 Pts
view longer
description
threshold: 1.0 pts
Exceeds Minimum
Expectations: The
student clearly identifies
the challenge of or
aspects of the chosen
issue. Student identifies
integral relationships
essential to the issue
being examined.
Meets Minimum Expectations:
The student identifies
information and summarizes
issues, though some aspects are
incorrect or confused. Essential
details maybe missing.
S History Project Paper 1
Ratings
Pts
4.0 Pts
The central purpose or
argument is not consistently
clear throughout the paper.
1.0 Pts
The purpose or argument
is generally unclear.
4.0 Pts
1.0 Pts
In general, the writing is
arranged logically, although
occasionally ideas fail to make
sense together. The reader is
fairly clear about what writer
intends.
The writing is not
logically organized.
Frequently, ideas fail to
make sense together.
The reader cannot
identify a line of
reasoning and loses
interest.
4.0 Pts
1.0 Pts
10.0 pts
10.0 pts
Some sentences are awkwardly
constructed so that the reader
is occasionally distracted.
Errors in sentence
structure are frequent
enough to be a major
distraction to the reader
4.0 Pts
1.0 Pts
Word choice is merely
adequate, and the range of
words is limited. Some words
are used inappropriately.
Many words are used
inappropriately,
confusing the reader.
4.0 Pts
1.0 Pts
10.0 pts
10.0 pts
10.0 pts
10.0 pts
The writing has many errors,
and the reader is distracted by
them.
There are so many
errors that meaning is
obscured. The reader is
confused and stops
reading.
4.0 Pts
1.0 Pts
Paper is 2 pages short of the
assignment requirements.
Paper is 3 pages or more
short of the assignments
requirements.
4.0 Pts
1.0 Pts
10.0 pts
10.0 pts
10.0 pts
Most of the references are from
sources that are not peerreviewed and have uncertain
reliability. The reader doubts
the accuracy of much of the
material presented.
There are virtually no
sources that are
professionally reliable.
The reader seriously
doubts the value of the
material and stops
reading.
4.0 Pts
1.0 Pts
There are frequent errors in
Chicago format.
Format of the document
is not recognizable as
Chicago.
10.0 pts
19.0 Pts
10.0 Pts
40.0 pts
Demonstrates a poor
understanding of topics
selected.
Demonstrates little
understanding of the
subject matter
0.0 Pts
2.0 pts
2.0 pts
Does Not Meet Minimum
Expectations: The student does
not identify information and to
summarize ideas and concepts
accurately.
U.S. History
Research/Writing Assignment
Colonization
The events of history are made by individuals. While many times the big names
or famous leaders get the attention, it is the regular common people who live out the
events. With that idea in mind your assignment is to take an individual who migrated to
America during a specific time period between1607-1753 and create a fictitious
account/journal based upon research with emphasis on primary documents (letters,
memoirs, diaries, or accounts from the time period). The journal should outline what
everyday life would have been like, significant events, people, and issues that would have
been prevalent in the assigned time and place, and how they fit into the overall history of
the colonies. The timeframe of the journal should cover at least one year but not exceed
beyond the colonization period average lifespan of an individual. The frequency and
style of entries is completely up to you; however, there must be included within the text
citations to sources used that provided the insight for your accounts. Your account
should not a recreation of a famous individual. It needs to be someone that you create
that fits accurately the time period and in line with the information of how life would be
during that time for an everyday person. Be creative but accurate with the facts and
events that you weave into the account that demonstrate you understand what that period
of history was actually like.
The paper is to be 4-6 typed and double-spaced pages in length and must contain
a formal title page, and a works cited page. In addition, students must use some type of
internal citation within the text of the paper. Any accepted citation style may be used
(MLA, APA, Turabian etc.) At least five sources should be included of which there
should be a blend of first person accounts, articles, newspapers, journals, and books with
no less than two of the sources being primary sources (These can include letters and
accounts assigned in class). The margins of the paper should be set at 1”. All proper
rules of structure and grammar should be applied to the paper. If you use any types of
images or other items to enhance your paper, you must make sure to include where you
obtained those in your list of sources. Also, be sure to proofread carefully.
The assignment is worth a total of 122 pts.

Purchase answer to see full
attachment