Annotated Bibliography Assignment | Get Homework Help

This topic is over COVID-19 vaccine research Assessment Specifics Whole document is formatted in APA or MLA manuscript style, as specified by your instructor, doublespaced, and in 12-point Times New Roman or similar font. Observation of the conventions of Standard English 1250 word minimum Includes the Research Rationale and List of Source Citations and Annotations Research Rationale 2-3 paragraphs (300-350 words) Describe the issue, problem, or controversy you are researching Identify the relationship between your topic idea and either one of the core readings or the theme of the core readings selected by your instructor Explain the significance or relevance of your research question(s) to you and to others Describe what you hope to discover in your research Include 1-3 specific and relevant research questions List of Source Citations with Annotations At least 6 relevant, up-to-date, and credible sources, representing different perspectives, responses, and/or information relevant to the research question(s) At least 1 of the CORE READINGS from your class’s core reading/focus text theme list At least 4 sources from the Ivy Tech Library subscription databases A 6th source, which may be 1 additional database source OR a reputable source of some other type (open Web source, video, podcast, personal interview, documentary film, TV news story, etc.) Correct Works Cited (MLA) or References (APA) source citations (as assigned by your instructor), arranged alphabetically by author’s last name All source citations are double-spaced and use hanging indents An annotation for each source that includes discussion of all five points for each source (Writer, Publication, Summary, Stance, and Use), each part clearly labeled Each annotation should be 1 paragraph, approximately 5-10 sentences long (125-150 words each) Rubric Writing Project 3 Annotated Bibliography Rubric Writing Project 3 Annotated Bibliography Rubric Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStyle Voice, tone, and stance are appropriate and effective for material, purpose, and audience. Style is clear, consistent, and cohesive, appealing appropriately to the intended audience. 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConventions Clear control of language conventions with few distracting typos or errors 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDocument Style Correct document format in APA or MLA style, as specified by the instructor, including source citations alphabetized and double-spaced, with hanging indents; appropriate and consistent spacing for research rational, annotations, and topic exploration statement; in size 12 Times New Roman or similar font 15.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResearch Rationale: Description of Topic Introduces and defines the issue, problem, or controversy explored. 15.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResearch Rationale: Significance Expresses the significance of the topic for both the researcher and potential audiences; effectively relates the topic to the core readings. 15.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResearch Rationale: Research Questions Includes 1-3 specific, relevant, and related research questions 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeNumber, and type, and quality of sources Total of 6 sources are listed; at least 1 source is one of the core readings. At least 4 sources are from the Ivy Tech Library subscription databases. All sources are online sources; each source is relevant to the research question(s), credible, and up-to-date. Sources demonstrate a variety of perspectives and source types. 15.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSource Citations Sources correctly cited following MLA or APA style, as specified by the instructor; correct identification of author(s), source title, publication title/publisher, publication date or volume/issue, source URL or library database information, etc. 25.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnnotations Each annotation accurately and critically evaluates source based on writer, publication, summary, stance, and use. 35.0 pts